Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMLCX vs PCNNX
LMLCX vs PCNNX Comparison
Open Charts LMLCX vs PCNNX
Western Asset SMASh Series C
Price$9.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets369.32M
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$9.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.4B
LMLCX vs PCNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMLCX vs. PCNNX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMLCX is a Hold and PCNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. LMLCX (369M). LMLCX pays higher dividends than PCNNX: LMLCX (6.53) vs PCNNX (4.47). LMLCX was incepted earlier than PCNNX: LMLCX (19 years) vs PCNNX (7 years). PCNNX (1.29) is less costly to investors than LMLCX (0.03). PCNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. LMLCX (6.00). LMLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: LMLCX (0) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.82 vs. LMLCX (2.96). LMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.70 vs. PCNNX (-0.90).
| LMLCX | PCNNX | LMLCX / PCNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.29 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.944 | 5.128 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 369M | 12.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.53 | 4.47 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.96 | 4.82 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.94 | 12.75 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.70 | -0.90 | -2,293% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement