Ad is loading...
LMLCX vs PCNNX
LMLCX vs PCNNX Comparison
Open Charts LMLCX vs PCNNX
Western Asset SMASh Series C
Price$8.64
Change-$0.05 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets388.1M
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$8.93
Change-$0.05 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.6B
LMLCX vs PCNNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMLCX vs. PCNNX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMLCX is a Hold and PCNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. LMLCX (388M). LMLCX pays higher dividends than PCNNX: LMLCX (6.61) vs PCNNX (4.33). LMLCX was incepted earlier than PCNNX: LMLCX (18 years) vs PCNNX (7 years). PCNNX (1.29) is less costly to investors than LMLCX (0.03). PCNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. LMLCX (7.00). LMLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: LMLCX (0) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. LMLCX (2.70). LMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.47 vs. PCNNX (2.58).
| LMLCX | PCNNX | LMLCX / PCNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.29 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.453 | 2.533 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 388M | 12.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 4.33 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.70 | 7.43 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.25 | 10.22 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.47 | 2.58 | 1,028% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...