LMND
Price
$41.27
Change
+$0.77 (+1.90%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
37 days until earnings call
QUCOF
Price
$8.80
Change
+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LMND vs QUCOF

Header iconLMND vs QUCOF Comparison
Open Charts LMND vs QUCOFBanner chart's image
Lemonade
Price$41.27
Change+$0.77 (+1.90%)
Volume$64.58K
Capitalization1.16B
Qualitas Controladora SAB De CV
Price$8.80
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Volume$3.77K
Capitalization1.99B
LMND vs QUCOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LMND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LMND vs. QUCOF commentary
Jun 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMND is a Hold and QUCOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2025
Stock price -- (LMND: $41.27 vs. QUCOF: $8.80)
Brand notoriety: LMND and QUCOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LMND: 3% vs. QUCOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LMND: $1.16B vs. QUCOF: $1.99B
LMND [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.16B. QUCOF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LMND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQUCOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LMND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QUCOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QUCOF is a better buy in the long-term than LMND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LMND’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LMND’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LMND (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.98% price change this week, while QUCOF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

LMND is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.01% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QUCOF($1.99B) has a higher market cap than LMND($1.16B). QUCOF YTD gains are higher at: 25.178 vs. LMND (12.514). QUCOF has more cash in the bank: 2.35B vs. LMND (938M). QUCOF has higher revenues than LMND: QUCOF (41.2B) vs LMND (430M).
LMNDQUCOFLMND / QUCOF
Capitalization1.16B1.99B58%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.51425.17850%
P/E RatioN/A14.25-
Revenue430M41.2B1%
Total Cash938M2.35B40%
Total Debt43.1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QUCOF: Fundamental Ratings
QUCOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LMND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LMND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICPUX6.320.01
+0.16%
Integrity Mid-North American Resources C
CMRAX10.08N/A
N/A
Calamos Merger Arbitrage A
NBMVX46.23-0.03
-0.06%
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Adv
PARWX53.34-0.09
-0.17%
Parnassus Value Equity Investor
IIIIX12.58-0.11
-0.87%
Voya International Index Port I

LMND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMND has been loosely correlated with ROOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMND jumps, then ROOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMND
1D Price
Change %
LMND100%
+1.90%
ROOT - LMND
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
KMPR - LMND
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
UFCS - LMND
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
BNT - LMND
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
L - LMND
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
More

QUCOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUCOF has been loosely correlated with LMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUCOF jumps, then LMND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUCOF
1D Price
Change %
QUCOF100%
N/A
LMND - QUCOF
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
PLMR - QUCOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
QBIEY - QUCOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
SSREY - QUCOF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
QBEIF - QUCOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More