Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMRIX vs RPFGX
LMRIX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts LMRIX vs RPFGX
LMRIX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMRIX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMRIX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. LMRIX (99.3M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than LMRIX: RPFGX (1.28) vs LMRIX (0.26). LMRIX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: LMRIX (18 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). LMRIX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RPFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. LMRIX (9.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMRIX: RPFGX (1000) vs LMRIX (1000000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. LMRIX (-9.26). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 56.70 vs. LMRIX (-13.02).
| LMRIX | RPFGX | LMRIX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.94 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.94 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.022 | 2.432 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.3M | 1.18B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.28 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.26 | 12.06 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.91 | 75.59 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.02 | 56.70 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.02 | 137.87 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers