LMSQF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.02 (-11.76%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
6.74M
LYSCF
Price
$5.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.31B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LMSQF vs LYSCF

Header iconLMSQF vs LYSCF Comparison
Open Charts LMSQF vs LYSCFBanner chart's image
Latin Metals
Price$0.15
Change-$0.02 (-11.76%)
Volume$14.1K
Capitalization6.74M
Lynas Rare Earths
Price$5.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$16.52K
Capitalization4.31B
LMSQF vs LYSCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LMSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LMSQF vs. LYSCF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMSQF is a Hold and LYSCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LMSQF: $0.15 vs. LYSCF: $5.49)
Brand notoriety: LMSQF and LYSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LMSQF: 47% vs. LYSCF: 30%
Market capitalization -- LMSQF: $6.74M vs. LYSCF: $4.31B
LMSQF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $6.74M. LYSCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $4.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LMSQF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLYSCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LMSQF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LYSCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LYSCF is a better buy in the long-term than LMSQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LMSQF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYSCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LMSQF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LYSCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LMSQF is a better buy in the short-term than LYSCF.

Price Growth

LMSQF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.54% price change this week, while LYSCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -9.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYSCF is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYSCF($4.31B) has a higher market cap than LMSQF($6.74M). LMSQF has higher P/E ratio than LYSCF: LMSQF (16.53) vs LYSCF (11.52). LMSQF YTD gains are higher at: 142.921 vs. LYSCF (36.908). LYSCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 617M vs. LMSQF (-892.32K). LYSCF has more cash in the bank: 102M vs. LMSQF (546K). LMSQF has less debt than LYSCF: LMSQF (65.8K) vs LYSCF (202M). LYSCF has higher revenues than LMSQF: LYSCF (961M) vs LMSQF (0).
LMSQFLYSCFLMSQF / LYSCF
Capitalization6.74M4.31B0%
EBITDA-892.32K617M-0%
Gain YTD142.92136.908387%
P/E Ratio16.5311.52143%
Revenue0961M-
Total Cash546K102M1%
Total Debt65.8K202M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LMSQF vs LYSCF: Fundamental Ratings
LMSQF
LYSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8082
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6149
SMR RATING
1..100
9682
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
822
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a26

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LMSQF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSCF (90). This means that LMSQF’s stock grew similarly to LYSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as LMSQF (61). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to LMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as LMSQF (96). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to LMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

LMSQF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSCF (42). This means that LMSQF’s stock grew similarly to LYSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LMSQF (82). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew significantly faster than LMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LMSQFLYSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LMSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BV15.700.55
+3.63%
BrightView Holdings
SLND4.490.10
+2.28%
Southland Holdings
CTAS219.363.70
+1.72%
Cintas Corp
FNB15.580.25
+1.63%
FNB Corp
NMTC0.700.01
+1.59%
NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corp

LMSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LMSQF and LYSCF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMSQF and LYSCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMSQF
1D Price
Change %
LMSQF100%
N/A
LYSCF - LMSQF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
KVLQF - LMSQF
13%
Poorly correlated
-3.27%
LEMIF - LMSQF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
BHSIF - LMSQF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.05%
KGHPF - LMSQF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LYSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYSCF has been closely correlated with LYSDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYSCF jumps, then LYSDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSCF
1D Price
Change %
LYSCF100%
+0.09%
LYSDY - LYSCF
86%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
BDNNY - LYSCF
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
RIO - LYSCF
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
BHP - LYSCF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
FCX - LYSCF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More