Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMVVX vs SSGSX
LMVVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LMVVX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value R5
Price$27.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.69M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.96B
LMVVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMVVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMVVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.96B vs. LMVVX (82.7M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LMVVX: SSGSX (0.49) vs LMVVX (0.00). LMVVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LMVVX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LMVVX (1.10). LMVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LMVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LMVVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.94 vs. LMVVX (-15.66). LMVVX return over 5 years is better than : 14.44 vs. SSGSX (2.50).
| LMVVX | SSGSX | LMVVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.26 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.26 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.309 | -4.243 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.7M | 4.96B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.66 | -13.94 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.27 | -10.31 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.44 | 2.50 | 577% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement