Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs MCDFX
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$46.38
Change-$0.75 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.47M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.39
Change-$0.22 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. LNGZX (50.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MCDFX (2.90) vs LNGZX (0.96). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: LNGZX (28 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: LNGZX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.31 vs. MCDFX (44.16). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.03 vs. LNGZX (-34.73).
| LNGZX | MCDFX | LNGZX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.32 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.828 | 26.291 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.5M | 99.4M | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 2.90 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.31 | 44.16 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.96 | 21.11 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.73 | -4.03 | 861% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.76 | 50.95 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement