Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs MCDFX
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$50.26
Change-$0.58 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.56M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.08
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. LNGZX (54.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MCDFX (2.90) vs LNGZX (0.96). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: LNGZX (28 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: LNGZX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.81 vs. MCDFX (28.24). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.03 vs. LNGZX (-28.34).
| LNGZX | MCDFX | LNGZX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.32 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.317 | 30.354 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.6M | 99.4M | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 2.90 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.81 | 28.24 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.45 | 33.67 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.34 | 2.03 | -1,397% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.07 | 51.73 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement