Ad is loading...
LNGZX vs MCDFX
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$39.74
Change+$0.32 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.85M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$12.66
Change+$0.06 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MCDFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. LNGZX (44.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MCDFX (3.57) vs LNGZX (1.07). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: LNGZX (28 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: LNGZX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.85 vs. LNGZX (19.30). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -1.72 vs. LNGZX (-25.15).
| LNGZX | MCDFX | LNGZX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.17 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.17 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.916 | 6.689 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.9M | 93.9M | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 3.57 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.30 | 22.85 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.58 | 1.41 | -183% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.15 | -1.72 | 1,459% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.46 | -1.65 | 1,057% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...