Ad is loading...
LNGZX vs MCDFX
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$36.91
Change-$0.12 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$11.85
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 14, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a Sell and MCDFX is a Sell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. LNGZX (46.1M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MCDFX (4.23) vs LNGZX (0.69). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: LNGZX (28 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: LNGZX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.57 vs. LNGZX (7.96). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.90 vs. LNGZX (-27.16).
| LNGZX | MCDFX | LNGZX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.435 | 16.916 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.1M | 101M | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 4.23 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.96 | 11.57 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | -42.71 | -31.16 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.16 | -7.90 | 344% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.16 | 15.33 | -164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers