Ad is loading...
LNGZX vs MCDFX
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$37.00
Change+$0.27 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$11.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 98M vs. LNGZX (44.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MCDFX (4.23) vs LNGZX (0.69). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: LNGZX (28 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: LNGZX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.85 vs. LNGZX (12.89). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -13.69 vs. LNGZX (-30.89).
| LNGZX | MCDFX | LNGZX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.687 | 14.345 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.3M | 98M | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 4.23 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.89 | 16.85 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | -34.16 | -24.35 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.89 | -13.69 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.49 | 15.11 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers