Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs MCDFX
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$47.24
Change-$0.34 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.9M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. LNGZX (50.9M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MCDFX (2.84) vs LNGZX (0.91). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: LNGZX (29 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: LNGZX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.22 vs. LNGZX (30.57). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.24 vs. LNGZX (-39.52).
| LNGZX | MCDFX | LNGZX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.32 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.048 | 30.959 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.9M | 99.3M | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 2.84 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.57 | 33.22 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.35 | 29.24 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.52 | -7.24 | 546% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.38 | 36.76 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement