Ad is loading...
LNGZX vs MCDFX
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$40.83
Change-$0.70 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.2M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.03
Change-$0.12 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MCDFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. LNGZX (50.2M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MCDFX (3.57) vs LNGZX (1.07). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: LNGZX (28 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: LNGZX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.78 vs. LNGZX (28.61). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.32 vs. LNGZX (-15.07).
| LNGZX | MCDFX | LNGZX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.17 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.17 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.639 | 11.346 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.2M | 93.9M | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 3.57 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.61 | 30.78 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.98 | -3.90 | 358% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.07 | 9.32 | -162% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.02 | 16.15 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...