Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs MCDFX
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$48.58
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.49M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. LNGZX (52.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MCDFX (2.78) vs LNGZX (0.87). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: LNGZX (28 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: LNGZX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.00 vs. MCDFX (27.74). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.89 vs. LNGZX (-36.25).
| LNGZX | MCDFX | LNGZX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.32 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.760 | 28.884 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.5M | 104M | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 2.78 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.00 | 27.74 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.62 | 36.75 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.25 | -3.89 | 931% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.40 | 36.67 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement