Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs MCDFX
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$42.47
Change-$0.13 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.97M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. LNGZX (47M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MCDFX (3.26) vs LNGZX (1.05). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: LNGZX (28 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: LNGZX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX (23.77) and LNGZX (23.69) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.58 vs. LNGZX (-32.41).
| LNGZX | MCDFX | LNGZX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.32 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.189 | 13.498 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47M | 88.3M | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 3.26 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.69 | 23.77 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.09 | -1.98 | 510% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.41 | -8.58 | 378% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.98 | 14.34 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement