Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs MCDFX
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$42.70
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.05M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.21
Change-$0.06 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MCDFX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. LNGZX (48.1M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MCDFX (3.72) vs LNGZX (1.13). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: LNGZX (28 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: LNGZX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). LNGZX (16.77) and MCDFX (16.52) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.95 vs. LNGZX (-20.03).
| LNGZX | MCDFX | LNGZX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.32 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.785 | 12.362 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.1M | 93.9M | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 3.72 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.77 | 16.52 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.10 | 7.27 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.03 | 2.95 | -678% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.48 | -0.42 | 2,248% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement