Ad is loading...
LNGZX vs MCDFX
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$43.08
Change+$0.73 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.53M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.12
Change+$0.22 (+1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.58M
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MCDFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 85.6M vs. LNGZX (49.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MCDFX (4.23) vs LNGZX (0.69). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: LNGZX (28 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: LNGZX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.61 vs. MCDFX (31.23). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.11 vs. LNGZX (-21.88).
| LNGZX | MCDFX | LNGZX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.843 | 11.092 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.5M | 85.6M | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 4.23 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.61 | 31.23 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.46 | -10.60 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.88 | -5.11 | 428% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.14 | 23.42 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers