Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs MICHX
LNGZX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MICHX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$46.38
Change-$0.75 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.47M
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$11.25
Change-$0.17 (-1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.64M
LNGZX vs MICHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MICHX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a StrongBuy and MICHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 71.6M vs. LNGZX (50.5M). MICHX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MICHX (1.23) vs LNGZX (0.96). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MICHX: LNGZX (28 years) vs MICHX (8 years). MICHX (1.50) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). MICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICHX: LNGZX (2000) vs MICHX (100000). LNGZX (47.31) and MICHX (45.39) have marching annual gain over last year. LNGZX return over 5 years is better than : -34.73 vs. MICHX (-41.04).
| LNGZX | MICHX | LNGZX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.20 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.50 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.828 | 26.049 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.5M | 71.6M | 71% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.23 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.31 | 45.39 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.96 | 5.96 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.73 | -41.04 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement