Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs MICHX
LNGZX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MICHX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$45.12
Change+$0.13 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.29M
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$11.34
Change+$0.27 (+2.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.26M
LNGZX vs MICHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MICHX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a StrongBuy and MICHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 66.3M vs. LNGZX (49.3M). MICHX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MICHX (1.35) vs LNGZX (1.03). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MICHX: LNGZX (28 years) vs MICHX (8 years). MICHX (1.50) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). MICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICHX: LNGZX (2000) vs MICHX (100000). MICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.85 vs. LNGZX (36.94). LNGZX return over 5 years is better than : -33.93 vs. MICHX (-42.30).
| LNGZX | MICHX | LNGZX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.20 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.50 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.023 | 22.185 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.3M | 66.3M | 74% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.35 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.94 | 38.85 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.00 | -7.29 | -96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.93 | -42.30 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement