LNNGF vs LNNGY
To understand the difference between Li Ning Co., Ltd. (LNNGF) vs. Li Ning Co., Ltd. - ADR (LNNGY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNNGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLNNGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LNNGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LNNGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNNGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNNGY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LNNGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LNNGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LNNGF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LNNGY (@Recreational Products) price change was -2.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -5.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.35%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Recreational Products (-5.06% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| LNNGF | LNNGY | LNNGF / LNNGY | |
| Capitalization | 15.9B | 15.9B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 5.76B | 6.97B | 83% |
| Gain YTD | -9.005 | -11.407 | 79% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.40 | 26.32 | 104% |
| Revenue | 24.8B | 25.8B | 96% |
| Total Cash | 10.9B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.64B | N/A | - |
LNNGF | LNNGY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LNNGY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as LNNGF (24). This means that LNNGY’s stock grew similarly to LNNGF’s over the last 12 months.
LNNGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LNNGF (100). This means that LNNGY’s stock grew similarly to LNNGF’s over the last 12 months.
LNNGY's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as LNNGF (37). This means that LNNGY’s stock grew similarly to LNNGF’s over the last 12 months.
LNNGF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as LNNGY (49). This means that LNNGF’s stock grew similarly to LNNGY’s over the last 12 months.
LNNGF's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as LNNGY (76). This means that LNNGF’s stock grew similarly to LNNGY’s over the last 12 months.
| LNNGF | LNNGY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
LNNGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LNNGF and ANPDY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNNGF and ANPDY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNNGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNNGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ANPDY - LNNGF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| LNNGY - LNNGF | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.31% | ||
| OLCLY - LNNGF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.86% | ||
| OLCLF - LNNGF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NCBDY - LNNGF | -1% Poorly correlated | +2.69% | ||
More | ||||
LNNGY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNNGY has been closely correlated with ANPDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNNGY jumps, then ANPDY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNNGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNNGY | 100% | +3.31% | ||
| ANPDY - LNNGY | 74% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| ANPDF - LNNGY | 33% Poorly correlated | +4.90% | ||
| HAS - LNNGY | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| SMNNY - LNNGY | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| MCFT - LNNGY | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
More | ||||