Ad is loading...
LNNGF
Price
$2.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
NCBDY
Price
$10.36
Change
-$0.22 (-2.08%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

LNNGF vs NCBDY

Header iconLNNGF vs NCBDY Comparison
Open Charts LNNGF vs NCBDYBanner chart's image
Li Ning
Price$2.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Bandai Namco Holdings
Price$10.36
Change-$0.22 (-2.08%)
Volume$54.44K
CapitalizationN/A
LNNGF vs NCBDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
NCBDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNNGF vs. NCBDY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNNGF is a Hold and NCBDY is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (LNNGF: $2.25 vs. NCBDY: $10.36)
Brand notoriety: LNNGF and NCBDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNNGF: 14% vs. NCBDY: 282%
Market capitalization -- LNNGF: $15.89B vs. NCBDY: $12.32B
LNNGF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $15.89B. NCBDY’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $12.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNNGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNCBDY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LNNGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NCBDY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LNNGF is a better buy in the long-term than NCBDY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NCBDY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NCBDY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

LNNGF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NCBDY (@Recreational Products) price change was -4.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -5.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-5.12% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNNGF($15.9B) has a higher market cap than NCBDY($12.3B). NCBDY (27.98) and LNNGF (27.40) have similar P/E ratio . NCBDY YTD gains are higher at: 5.567 vs. LNNGF (-14.692). NCBDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 98.4B vs. LNNGF (5.76B). NCBDY has more cash in the bank: 228B vs. LNNGF (10.9B). LNNGF has less debt than NCBDY: LNNGF (1.64B) vs NCBDY (11.1B). NCBDY has higher revenues than LNNGF: NCBDY (1.02T) vs LNNGF (24.8B).
LNNGFNCBDYLNNGF / NCBDY
Capitalization15.9B12.3B129%
EBITDA5.76B98.4B6%
Gain YTD-14.6925.567-264%
P/E Ratio27.4027.9898%
Revenue24.8B1.02T2%
Total Cash10.9B228B5%
Total Debt1.64B11.1B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNNGF: Fundamental Ratings
LNNGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
38
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NCBDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NCBDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTISX136.56-0.65
-0.47%
Vanguard Total Intl Stock Idx Instl Sel
JSEAX18.83-0.18
-0.95%
JPMorgan International Equity A
GGSOX15.80-0.20
-1.25%
Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Investor
RYOFX14.89-0.21
-1.39%
Royce Small-Cap Opportunity Svc
GFCUX22.70-0.33
-1.43%
Goldman Sachs Enh CorEqFund-ShareClassR6

LNNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LNNGF and ANPDY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNNGF and ANPDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNNGF
1D Price
Change %
LNNGF100%
N/A
ANPDY - LNNGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
LNNGY - LNNGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
OLCLY - LNNGF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
OLCLF - LNNGF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCBDY - LNNGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
More

NCBDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCBDY and YAMCY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCBDY and YAMCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCBDY
1D Price
Change %
NCBDY100%
-2.08%
YAMCY - NCBDY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
NCBDF - NCBDY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLCLY - NCBDY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
MSGE - NCBDY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
YETI - NCBDY
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
More