LNNGF
Price
$2.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.91B
NCBDY
Price
$18.70
Change
-$0.25 (-1.32%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
24.12B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNNGF vs NCBDY

Header iconLNNGF vs NCBDY Comparison
Open Charts LNNGF vs NCBDYBanner chart's image
Li Ning
Price$2.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$208
Capitalization5.91B
Bandai Namco Holdings
Price$18.70
Change-$0.25 (-1.32%)
Volume$13.43K
Capitalization24.12B
LNNGF vs NCBDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCBDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNNGF vs. NCBDY commentary
Aug 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNNGF is a Hold and NCBDY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2025
Stock price -- (LNNGF: $2.08 vs. NCBDY: $18.70)
Brand notoriety: LNNGF and NCBDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNNGF: 11% vs. NCBDY: 47%
Market capitalization -- LNNGF: $5.91B vs. NCBDY: $24.12B
LNNGF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $5.91B. NCBDY’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $24.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $37.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNNGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNCBDY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LNNGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NCBDY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NCBDY is a better buy in the long-term than LNNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNNGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCBDY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNNGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NCBDY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NCBDY is a better buy in the short-term than LNNGF.

Price Growth

LNNGF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NCBDY (@Recreational Products) price change was +5.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+4.24% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NCBDY($24.1B) has a higher market cap than LNNGF($5.91B). NCBDY has higher P/E ratio than LNNGF: NCBDY (27.93) vs LNNGF (12.82). NCBDY YTD gains are higher at: 58.353 vs. LNNGF (-13.333).
LNNGFNCBDYLNNGF / NCBDY
Capitalization5.91B24.1B25%
EBITDAN/A238B-
Gain YTD-13.33358.353-23%
P/E Ratio12.8227.9346%
RevenueN/A1.16T-
Total CashN/A352B-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNNGF vs NCBDY: Fundamental Ratings
LNNGF
NCBDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9725
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10023
SMR RATING
1..100
379
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2912
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNNGF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCBDY (83). This means that LNNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCBDY’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNNGF (100). This means that NCBDY’s stock grew significantly faster than LNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDY's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as LNNGF (37). This means that NCBDY’s stock grew similarly to LNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as LNNGF (51). This means that NCBDY’s stock grew similarly to LNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDY's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as LNNGF (29). This means that NCBDY’s stock grew similarly to LNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNNGFNCBDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCBDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYZCX135.24N/A
N/A
Rydex Precious Metals C
KLCCX11.68N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
TRWAX24.61N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Equity A
GFCUX24.11N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity R6
RGAEX84.06-0.04
-0.05%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R4

LNNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LNNGF and ANPDY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNNGF and ANPDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNNGF
1D Price
Change %
LNNGF100%
N/A
ANPDY - LNNGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
LNNGY - LNNGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.78%
OLCLY - LNNGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
OLCLF - LNNGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+13.97%
NCBDY - LNNGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
More

NCBDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCBDY and YAMCY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCBDY and YAMCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCBDY
1D Price
Change %
NCBDY100%
-1.31%
YAMCY - NCBDY
32%
Poorly correlated
-5.49%
NCBDF - NCBDY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLCLY - NCBDY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
MSGE - NCBDY
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
YETI - NCBDY
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.10%
More