LNSPF
Price
$2.64
Change
+$0.01 (+0.38%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
MAPIF
Price
$1.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.77B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNSPF vs MAPIF

Header iconLNSPF vs MAPIF Comparison
Open Charts LNSPF vs MAPIFBanner chart's image
London & Stamford Property
Price$2.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.38%)
Volume$5.47K
Capitalization2.34B
Mapletree Industrial Trust
Price$1.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization4.77B
LNSPF vs MAPIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNSPF vs. MAPIF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNSPF is a Buy and MAPIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (LNSPF: $2.64 vs. MAPIF: $1.58)
Brand notoriety: LNSPF and MAPIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNSPF: 134% vs. MAPIF: 45%
Market capitalization -- LNSPF: $2.34B vs. MAPIF: $4.77B
LNSPF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.34B. MAPIF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $4.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNSPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAPIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LNSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAPIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAPIF is a better buy in the long-term than LNSPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNSPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAPIF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNSPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAPIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNSPF is a better buy in the short-term than MAPIF.

Price Growth

LNSPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +0.38% price change this week, while MAPIF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.61% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAPIF($4.77B) has a higher market cap than LNSPF($2.34B). MAPIF has higher P/E ratio than LNSPF: MAPIF (22.88) vs LNSPF (7.23). LNSPF YTD gains are higher at: 17.073 vs. MAPIF (-12.222). MAPIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 425M vs. LNSPF (-477.5M). MAPIF has more cash in the bank: 520M vs. LNSPF (23.9M). LNSPF has less debt than MAPIF: LNSPF (1.02B) vs MAPIF (3.12B). MAPIF has higher revenues than LNSPF: MAPIF (624M) vs LNSPF (147M).
LNSPFMAPIFLNSPF / MAPIF
Capitalization2.34B4.77B49%
EBITDA-477.5M425M-112%
Gain YTD17.073-12.222-140%
P/E Ratio7.2322.8832%
Revenue147M624M24%
Total Cash23.9M520M5%
Total Debt1.02B3.12B33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNSPF vs MAPIF: Fundamental Ratings
LNSPF
MAPIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4847
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99100
SMR RATING
1..100
9280
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAPIF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSPF (84). This means that MAPIF’s stock grew similarly to LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as MAPIF (100). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to MAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

MAPIF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSPF (92). This means that MAPIF’s stock grew similarly to LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.

MAPIF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSPF (56). This means that MAPIF’s stock grew similarly to LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as MAPIF (97). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to MAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNSPFMAPIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RERAX56.520.35
+0.62%
American Funds EUPAC R1
WILJX22.150.08
+0.36%
William Blair International Ldrs R6
IHORX21.63N/A
N/A
Hartford International Opportunities R3
JMNCX13.15N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Research Market Neutral C
GPIGX13.18N/A
N/A
Guidepath® Growth and Income

LNSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNSPF has been loosely correlated with MEIYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNSPF jumps, then MEIYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNSPF
1D Price
Change %
LNSPF100%
N/A
MEIYF - LNSPF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DWVYF - LNSPF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FESNF - LNSPF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHTH - LNSPF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPIF - LNSPF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MAPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAPIF has been loosely correlated with FESNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAPIF jumps, then FESNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAPIF
1D Price
Change %
MAPIF100%
N/A
FESNF - MAPIF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DRETF - MAPIF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LNSPF - MAPIF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGIUF - MAPIF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHTH - MAPIF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More