LNSPF
Price
$2.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.73B
NTSGF
Price
$1.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.17B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNSPF vs NTSGF

Header iconLNSPF vs NTSGF Comparison
Open Charts LNSPF vs NTSGFBanner chart's image
London & Stamford Property
Price$2.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.84K
Capitalization5.73B
NATIONAL STORAGE REIT
Price$1.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization2.17B
LNSPF vs NTSGF Comparison Chart in %
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNSPF vs. NTSGF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNSPF is a Hold and NTSGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LNSPF: $2.45 vs. NTSGF: $1.58)
Brand notoriety: LNSPF and NTSGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNSPF: 64% vs. NTSGF: 70%
Market capitalization -- LNSPF: $5.73B vs. NTSGF: $2.17B
LNSPF [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] is valued at $5.73B. NTSGF’s [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] market capitalization is $2.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry ranges from $108.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry is $8.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNSPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTSGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LNSPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NTSGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTSGF is a better buy in the long-term than LNSPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNSPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTSGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNSPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NTSGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTSGF is a better buy in the short-term than LNSPF.

Price Growth

LNSPF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NTSGF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (+0.95% weekly)

Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNSPF($5.73B) has a higher market cap than NTSGF($2.17B). NTSGF has higher P/E ratio than LNSPF: NTSGF (120.11) vs LNSPF (10.72). NTSGF (8.966) and LNSPF (8.647) have similar YTD gains . LNSPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 468M vs. NTSGF (315M). NTSGF has more cash in the bank: 223M vs. LNSPF (41.8M). NTSGF has less debt than LNSPF: NTSGF (1.97B) vs LNSPF (2.1B). LNSPF has higher revenues than NTSGF: LNSPF (397M) vs NTSGF (358M).
LNSPFNTSGFLNSPF / NTSGF
Capitalization5.73B2.17B264%
EBITDA468M315M149%
Gain YTD8.6478.96696%
P/E Ratio10.72120.119%
Revenue397M358M111%
Total Cash41.8M223M19%
Total Debt2.1B1.97B106%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNSPF: Fundamental Ratings
LNSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNSPFNTSGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMUFX25.760.28
+1.10%
MFS Utilities A
RIGGX45.620.26
+0.57%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc R6
MWOCX50.830.24
+0.47%
MFS Global Growth C
ARZDX6.210.02
+0.32%
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Z
RDLAX12.50-0.07
-0.56%
Columbia Disciplined Growth A

LNSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNSPF has been loosely correlated with MEIYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNSPF jumps, then MEIYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNSPF
1D Price
Change %
LNSPF100%
N/A
MEIYF - LNSPF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FESNF - LNSPF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHTH - LNSPF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPIF - LNSPF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSA - LNSPF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
More

NTSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTSGF has been loosely correlated with FRZCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTSGF jumps, then FRZCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTSGF
1D Price
Change %
NTSGF100%
N/A
FRZCF - NTSGF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRKWF - NTSGF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRWRF - NTSGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPGF - NTSGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNSPF - NTSGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More