LNVGF vs RCAT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNVGF is a Hold and RCAT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNVGF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRCAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LNVGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- RCAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RCAT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- RCAT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
LNVGF (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +15.51% price change this week, while RCAT (@Computer Peripherals) price change was -13.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was -1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +74.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
LNVGF is expected to report earnings on May 22, 2025.
RCAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (-1.55% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| LNVGF | RCAT | LNVGF / RCAT | |
| Capitalization | 13.9B | 58.6M | 23,720% |
| EBITDA | 3.81B | -25.72M | -14,795% |
| Gain YTD | 36.134 | -39.611 | -91% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.32 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 61.9B | 17.9M | 345,810% |
| Total Cash | 5.63B | 7.7M | 73,119% |
| Total Debt | 4.89B | 1.39M | 351,437% |
LNVGF | RCAT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LNVGF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCAT (92). This means that LNVGF’s stock grew significantly faster than RCAT’s over the last 12 months.
LNVGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as RCAT (32). This means that LNVGF’s stock grew similarly to RCAT’s over the last 12 months.
LNVGF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCAT (98). This means that LNVGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCAT’s over the last 12 months.
RCAT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as LNVGF (36). This means that RCAT’s stock grew similarly to LNVGF’s over the last 12 months.
LNVGF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCAT (98). This means that LNVGF’s stock grew significantly faster than RCAT’s over the last 12 months.
| RCAT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% |
LNVGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNVGF has been loosely correlated with LNVGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNVGF jumps, then LNVGY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNVGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNVGF | 100% | +15.89% | ||
| LNVGY - LNVGF | 38% Loosely correlated | +12.15% | ||
| QUBT - LNVGF | 6% Poorly correlated | -7.42% | ||
| RCAT - LNVGF | 1% Poorly correlated | -8.71% | ||
| CRSR - LNVGF | 0% Poorly correlated | -5.67% | ||
| VRTK - LNVGF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RCAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RCAT and IONQ have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCAT and IONQ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCAT | 100% | -8.71% | ||
| IONQ - RCAT | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.96% | ||
| QBTS - RCAT | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
| UAVS - RCAT | 23% Poorly correlated | -7.65% | ||
| CAN - RCAT | 23% Poorly correlated | -6.70% | ||
| PSTG - RCAT | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.03% | ||
More | ||||