It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePENN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PENN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
LNW (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -9.38% price change this week, while PENN (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +1.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.43%.
LNW is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
PENN is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
LNW | PENN | LNW / PENN | |
Capitalization | 9.08B | 2.79B | 326% |
EBITDA | 898M | 400M | 225% |
Gain YTD | 13.555 | -20.138 | -67% |
P/E Ratio | 57.73 | 4.47 | 1,290% |
Revenue | 2.9B | 6.36B | 46% |
Total Cash | 425M | 1.07B | 40% |
Total Debt | 3.93B | 11.5B | 34% |
LNW | PENN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PENN's Valuation (58) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as LNW (77). This means that PENN’s stock grew similarly to LNW’s over the last 12 months.
LNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for PENN (100). This means that LNW’s stock grew significantly faster than PENN’s over the last 12 months.
LNW's SMR Rating (28) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for PENN (94). This means that LNW’s stock grew significantly faster than PENN’s over the last 12 months.
PENN's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as LNW (58). This means that PENN’s stock grew similarly to LNW’s over the last 12 months.
LNW's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as PENN (100). This means that LNW’s stock grew similarly to PENN’s over the last 12 months.
LNW | PENN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 10 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago73% | 3 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago84% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
XLU | 79.25 | 1.17 | +1.50% |
The Utilities Select Sector SPDR® ETF | |||
RWX | 24.28 | 0.15 | +0.62% |
SPDR® Dow Jones® International RelEstETF | |||
SUSB | 24.77 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corp Bd ETF | |||
EEMX | 33.10 | -0.07 | -0.20% |
SPDR® MSCI Em Mkts Fssl Ful Free RsrvETF | |||
NBDS | 30.00 | -0.84 | -2.71% |
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNW has been closely correlated with BYD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNW jumps, then BYD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LNW | 100% | +0.15% | ||
BYD - LNW | 76% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
PENN - LNW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
CNTY - LNW | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
ACEL - LNW | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
CZR - LNW | 35% Loosely correlated | -5.00% | ||
More |