LNW vs RYLD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNW is a Hold and RYLD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- LNW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LNW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LNW (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +4.96% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +74.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
LNW is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-1.55% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
LNW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LNW | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 18 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VIXM | 15.09 | 0.40 | +2.72% |
| ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures | |||
| IBTM | 22.48 | 0.12 | +0.54% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Trs ETF | |||
| FLEU | 26.79 | -0.19 | -0.70% |
| Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF | |||
| ILCB | 83.11 | -1.48 | -1.75% |
| iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | |||
| AVUV | 93.91 | -2.56 | -2.65% |
| Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | |||
LNW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNW has been closely correlated with BYD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNW jumps, then BYD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNW | 100% | -2.92% | ||
| BYD - LNW | 76% Closely correlated | -3.22% | ||
| PENN - LNW | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| CNTY - LNW | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| ACEL - LNW | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.61% | ||
| WYNN - LNW | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.90% | ||
More | ||||
RYLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RYLD has been loosely correlated with LNW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RYLD jumps, then LNW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYLD | 100% | -2.21% | ||
| LNW - RYLD | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| FIX - RYLD | 44% Loosely correlated | -4.74% | ||
| CVNA - RYLD | 43% Loosely correlated | -9.86% | ||
| ONTO - RYLD | 37% Loosely correlated | -4.60% | ||
| WFRD - RYLD | 32% Poorly correlated | -6.42% | ||
More | ||||