LNXSF
Price
$26.00
Change
-$0.50 (-1.89%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.3B
MTLHF
Price
$5.85
Change
+$0.36 (+6.56%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNXSF vs MTLHF

Header iconLNXSF vs MTLHF Comparison
Open Charts LNXSF vs MTLHFBanner chart's image
Lanxess Ag
Price$26.00
Change-$0.50 (-1.89%)
Volume$122
Capitalization2.3B
Mitsubishi Chemical Group
Price$5.85
Change+$0.36 (+6.56%)
Volume$174
Capitalization8.19B
LNXSF vs MTLHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTLHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNXSF vs. MTLHF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNXSF is a Hold and MTLHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LNXSF: $26.00 vs. MTLHF: $5.85)
Brand notoriety: LNXSF and MTLHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNXSF: 17% vs. MTLHF: 51%
Market capitalization -- LNXSF: $2.3B vs. MTLHF: $8.19B
LNXSF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $2.3B. MTLHF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $8.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $222.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNXSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTLHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LNXSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTLHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTLHF is a better buy in the long-term than LNXSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNXSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTLHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNXSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MTLHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTLHF is a better buy in the short-term than LNXSF.

Price Growth

LNXSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -1.89% price change this week, while MTLHF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.18% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLHF($8.19B) has a higher market cap than LNXSF($2.3B). MTLHF YTD gains are higher at: 13.043 vs. LNXSF (6.443). MTLHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 553B vs. LNXSF (530M). MTLHF has more cash in the bank: 352B vs. LNXSF (625M). MTLHF has higher revenues than LNXSF: MTLHF (4.48T) vs LNXSF (6.15B).
LNXSFMTLHFLNXSF / MTLHF
Capitalization2.3B8.19B28%
EBITDA530M553B0%
Gain YTD6.44313.04349%
P/E RatioN/A27.30-
Revenue6.15B4.48T0%
Total Cash625M352B0%
Total DebtN/A2.09T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNXSF vs MTLHF: Fundamental Ratings
LNXSF
MTLHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8388
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10099
SMR RATING
1..100
93100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
118
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a8

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTLHF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNXSF (75). This means that MTLHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTLHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as LNXSF (100). This means that MTLHF’s stock grew similarly to LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

LNXSF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLHF (100). This means that LNXSF’s stock grew similarly to MTLHF’s over the last 12 months.

MTLHF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as LNXSF (82). This means that MTLHF’s stock grew similarly to LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTLHF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as LNXSF (11). This means that MTLHF’s stock grew similarly to LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNXSFMTLHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTLHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBO14.020.10
+0.72%
Invesco DB Oil
AADR85.66N/A
N/A
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
BGJTF9.92N/A
N/A
Baillie Gifford Japan Trust Plc. (The)
BSJQ23.37-0.01
-0.06%
Invesco BulletShares 2026 HY Corp Bd ETF
FIVY38.06-0.64
-1.65%
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Inc ETF

LNXSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LNXSF and ECL have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNXSF and ECL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNXSF
1D Price
Change %
LNXSF100%
N/A
ECL - LNXSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
PPG - LNXSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
KURRY - LNXSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTLHF - LNXSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+6.65%
MITUY - LNXSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MTLHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTLHF and MITUY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTLHF and MITUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTLHF
1D Price
Change %
MTLHF100%
+6.65%
MITUY - MTLHF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNXSF - MTLHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KOYJF - MTLHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KURRY - MTLHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KURRF - MTLHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More