LNZA
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.11 (-29.73%)
Updated
Aug 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
60.29M
MEG
Price
$28.02
Change
-$0.06 (-0.21%)
Updated
Aug 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
988.02M
87 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNZA vs MEG

Header iconLNZA vs MEG Comparison
Open Charts LNZA vs MEGBanner chart's image
LanzaTech Global
Price$0.26
Change-$0.11 (-29.73%)
Volume$9.77K
Capitalization60.29M
Montrose Environmental Group
Price$28.02
Change-$0.06 (-0.21%)
Volume$8.28K
Capitalization988.02M
LNZA vs MEG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNZA vs. MEG commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNZA is a Hold and MEG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (LNZA: $0.26 vs. MEG: $28.00)
Brand notoriety: LNZA and MEG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNZA: 235% vs. MEG: 119%
Market capitalization -- LNZA: $60.29M vs. MEG: $988.02M
LNZA [@Environmental Services] is valued at $60.29M. MEG’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $988.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $91.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNZA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMEG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LNZA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MEG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LNZA and MEG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNZA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MEG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNZA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MEG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MEG is a better buy in the short-term than LNZA.

Price Growth

LNZA (@Environmental Services) experienced а -20.69% price change this week, while MEG (@Environmental Services) price change was +7.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

MEG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+1.96% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEG($988M) has a higher market cap than LNZA($60.3M). MEG YTD gains are higher at: 50.943 vs. LNZA (-81.029). MEG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.7M vs. LNZA (-108.99M). MEG has more cash in the bank: 30.3M vs. LNZA (21.2M). LNZA has less debt than MEG: LNZA (64.7M) vs MEG (301M). MEG has higher revenues than LNZA: MEG (719M) vs LNZA (48.8M).
LNZAMEGLNZA / MEG
Capitalization60.3M988M6%
EBITDA-108.99M25.7M-424%
Gain YTD-81.02950.943-159%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue48.8M719M7%
Total Cash21.2M30.3M70%
Total Debt64.7M301M21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MEG: Fundamental Ratings
MEG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
73

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNZAMEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGPMX16.19N/A
N/A
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Investor
FAEVX25.27N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Equity Value Z
ARSKX74.58N/A
N/A
Archer Stock
BPTIX211.03-1.21
-0.57%
Baron Partners Institutional
FOSCX29.55-0.30
-1.01%
Tributary Small Company Instl

LNZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNZA has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNZA jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNZA
1D Price
Change %
LNZA100%
-30.55%
HAIUF - LNZA
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ABAT - LNZA
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
MLAC - LNZA
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QRHC - LNZA
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
CLH - LNZA
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
More

MEG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MEG and NVRI have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MEG and NVRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEG
1D Price
Change %
MEG100%
-0.28%
NVRI - MEG
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
CLH - MEG
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
LNZA - MEG
21%
Poorly correlated
-30.55%
PESI - MEG
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
QRHC - MEG
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More