LNZA
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Updated
Apr 8, 02:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
583.14M
MEG
Price
$10.90
Change
-$0.78 (-6.68%)
Updated
Apr 8, 02:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.19B
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LNZA vs MEG

Header iconLNZA vs MEG Comparison
Open Charts LNZA vs MEGBanner chart's image
LanzaTech Global
Price$0.21
Change-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Volume$300
Capitalization583.14M
Montrose Environmental Group
Price$10.90
Change-$0.78 (-6.68%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.19B
LNZA vs MEG Comparison Chart
Loading...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNZA vs. MEG commentary
Apr 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNZA is a StrongBuy and MEG is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 08, 2025
Stock price -- (LNZA: $0.22 vs. MEG: $11.68)
Brand notoriety: LNZA and MEG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNZA: 66% vs. MEG: 182%
Market capitalization -- LNZA: $583.14M vs. MEG: $1.19B
LNZA [@Environmental Services] is valued at $583.14M. MEG’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNZA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMEG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LNZA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MEG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LNZA and MEG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNZA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MEG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNZA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MEG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNZA is a better buy in the short-term than MEG.

Price Growth

LNZA (@Environmental Services) experienced а -10.04% price change this week, while MEG (@Environmental Services) price change was -18.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -5.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

LNZA is expected to report earnings on Mar 29, 2023.

MEG is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-5.98% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEG($1.2B) has a higher market cap than LNZA($583M). MEG YTD gains are higher at: -37.035 vs. LNZA (-84.102). MEG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.9M vs. LNZA (-100.93M). LNZA has more cash in the bank: 121M vs. MEG (23.2M). LNZA has less debt than MEG: LNZA (19.9M) vs MEG (210M). MEG has higher revenues than LNZA: MEG (624M) vs LNZA (62.6M).
LNZAMEGLNZA / MEG
Capitalization583M1.2B49%
EBITDA-100.93M31.9M-316%
Gain YTD-84.102-37.035227%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue62.6M624M10%
Total Cash121M23.2M522%
Total Debt19.9M210M9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MEG: Fundamental Ratings
MEG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNZAMEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDVFX20.33N/A
N/A
JHancock Disciplined Value R4
UIIFX25.42N/A
N/A
Victory International Institutional
FCIRX15.30N/A
N/A
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl A
HSLYX38.06-0.30
-0.78%
Hartford Small Cap Growth Y
KNGLX10.73-0.21
-1.92%
Vest S&P500 Div Aristocrats Trgt Inc Inv

LNZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNZA has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNZA jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNZA
1D Price
Change %
LNZA100%
+4.06%
HAIUF - LNZA
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLH - LNZA
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
MLAC - LNZA
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
QRHC - LNZA
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
PESI - LNZA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
More

MEG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MEG and LICYF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MEG and LICYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEG
1D Price
Change %
MEG100%
-1.43%
LICYF - MEG
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.94%
LNZA - MEG
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.06%
GFL - MEG
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.02%
ESGL - MEG
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.02%
QRHC - MEG
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
More