LNZA
Price
$19.26
Change
+$0.40 (+2.12%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
43.75M
MLAC
Price
$10.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
319.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNZA vs MLAC

Header iconLNZA vs MLAC Comparison
Open Charts LNZA vs MLACBanner chart's image
LanzaTech Global
Price$19.26
Change+$0.40 (+2.12%)
Volume$150
Capitalization43.75M
Mountain Lake Acquisition
Price$10.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30.01K
Capitalization319.22M
LNZA vs MLAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNZA vs. MLAC commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNZA is a Hold and MLAC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LNZA: $18.86 vs. MLAC: $10.30)
Brand notoriety: LNZA and MLAC are both not notable
LNZA represents the Environmental Services, while MLAC is part of the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNZA: 45% vs. MLAC: 203%
Market capitalization -- LNZA: $43.75M vs. MLAC: $319.22M
LNZA [@Environmental Services] is valued at $43.75M. MLAC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $319.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.65B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.13B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.82M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNZA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LNZA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LNZA is a better buy in the long-term than MLAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNZA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLAC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNZA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MLAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLAC is a better buy in the short-term than LNZA.

Price Growth

LNZA (@Environmental Services) experienced а -12.14% price change this week, while MLAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.78%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+1.53% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.01% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLAC($319M) has a higher market cap than LNZA($43.8M). MLAC has more cash in the bank: 1.16M vs. LNZA (6.67K).
LNZAMLACLNZA / MLAC
Capitalization43.8M319M14%
EBITDA-108.99MN/A-
Gain YTD-86.234N/A-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue48.8MN/A-
Total Cash6.67K1.16M1%
Total Debt64.7MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNZAMLAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
8%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RLXXF46.651.05
+2.30%
RELX PLC
FPRUY44.49N/A
N/A
Fraport AG
BYSD0.75N/A
N/A
Bayside Corp.
SRHBY9.63N/A
N/A
Starhub, Ltd.
AVHHL0.90N/A
N/A
Avita Medical, Inc.

LNZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNZA has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNZA jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNZA
1D Price
Change %
LNZA100%
-5.46%
HAIUF - LNZA
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ABAT - LNZA
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.56%
MLAC - LNZA
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLH - LNZA
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
QRHC - LNZA
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.81%
More

MLAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLAC has been loosely correlated with BOWNU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLAC jumps, then BOWNU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLAC
1D Price
Change %
MLAC100%
N/A
BOWNU - MLAC
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CXAI - MLAC
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.67%
ATMV - MLAC
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.57%
LNZA - MLAC
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.46%
SOC - MLAC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
More