Ad is loading...
LNZA
Price
$1.08
Change
-$0.13 (-10.66%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
QRHC
Price
$6.80
Change
-$0.26 (-3.68%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
116 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LNZA vs QRHC

Header iconLNZA vs QRHC Comparison
Open Charts LNZA vs QRHCBanner chart's image
LanzaTech Global
Price$1.08
Change-$0.13 (-10.66%)
Volume$704.41K
CapitalizationN/A
Quest Resource Holding
Price$6.80
Change-$0.26 (-3.68%)
Volume$87.02K
CapitalizationN/A
LNZA vs QRHC Comparison Chart
Loading...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
QRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNZA vs. QRHC commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNZA is a Sell and QRHC is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (LNZA: $1.09 vs. QRHC: $6.80)
Brand notoriety: LNZA and QRHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNZA: 175% vs. QRHC: 183%
Market capitalization -- LNZA: $583.14M vs. QRHC: $171.05M
LNZA [@Environmental Services] is valued at $583.14M. QRHC’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $171.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNZA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQRHC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LNZA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QRHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QRHC is a better buy in the long-term than LNZA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNZA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QRHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNZA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QRHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LNZA and QRHC are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LNZA (@Environmental Services) experienced а -36.18% price change this week, while QRHC (@Environmental Services) price change was -5.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -5.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

LNZA is expected to report earnings on Mar 29, 2023.

QRHC is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-5.45% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNZA($583M) has a higher market cap than QRHC($171M). QRHC YTD gains are higher at: -7.162 vs. LNZA (-78.429). QRHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.8M vs. LNZA (-100.93M). LNZA has more cash in the bank: 121M vs. QRHC (324K). LNZA has less debt than QRHC: LNZA (19.9M) vs QRHC (67.6M). QRHC has higher revenues than LNZA: QRHC (288M) vs LNZA (62.6M).
LNZAQRHCLNZA / QRHC
Capitalization583M171M341%
EBITDA-100.93M12.8M-789%
Gain YTD-78.429-7.1621,095%
P/E RatioN/A62.50-
Revenue62.6M288M22%
Total Cash121M324K37,346%
Total Debt19.9M67.6M29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QRHC: Fundamental Ratings
QRHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNZAQRHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
QRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGBRX17.63-0.04
-0.23%
MFS Global Total Return R2
BCLPX8.39-0.02
-0.24%
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Inv C
SSIPX11.22-0.03
-0.27%
State Street International Stock Sel I
EEMGX7.99-0.03
-0.37%
MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research R4
FERCX39.87-0.50
-1.24%
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia C

LNZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNZA has been loosely correlated with BCSAU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNZA jumps, then BCSAU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNZA
1D Price
Change %
LNZA100%
-11.07%
BCSAU - LNZA
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HAIAU - LNZA
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
QRHC - LNZA
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
MEG - LNZA
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.00%
CWST - LNZA
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
More

QRHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QRHC and PESI have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QRHC and PESI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QRHC
1D Price
Change %
QRHC100%
-3.61%
PESI - QRHC
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.56%
NVRI - QRHC
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
LNZA - QRHC
24%
Poorly correlated
-11.07%
CLH - QRHC
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
CWST - QRHC
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
More