It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNZA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTESI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNZA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TESI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LNZA (@Environmental Services) experienced а -2.91% price change this week, while TESI (@Environmental Services) price change was +21.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.87%.
LNZA is expected to report earnings on Mar 29, 2023.
Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
LNZA | TESI | LNZA / TESI | |
Capitalization | 583M | N/A | - |
EBITDA | -100.93M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -80.716 | -60.014 | 134% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 62.6M | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 121M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 19.9M | N/A | - |
LNZA | TESI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago66% | 3 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago73% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago64% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago54% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GSTRX | 9.90 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R | |||
MXYKX | 6.85 | N/A | N/A |
Empower T. Rowe Price Mid Cp Gr Instl | |||
NPNCX | 46.00 | -0.21 | -0.45% |
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value C | |||
JPVZX | 14.18 | -0.12 | -0.84% |
JPMorgan Developed International ValueR2 | |||
YOVIX | 16.72 | -0.18 | -1.07% |
Yorktown Small-Cap Institutional |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNZA has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNZA jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LNZA | 100% | -3.00% | ||
HAIUF - LNZA | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
PESI - LNZA | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.97% | ||
QRHC - LNZA | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
CLH - LNZA | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.20% | ||
MEG - LNZA | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.10% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TESI and AHHLF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TESI and AHHLF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TESI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TESI | 100% | -3.48% | ||
AHHLF - TESI | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TSPCF - TESI | 6% Poorly correlated | -4.26% | ||
ANRGF - TESI | 6% Poorly correlated | -6.67% | ||
AGXXF - TESI | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.31% | ||
LNZA - TESI | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.00% | ||
More |