LNZA
Price
$21.18
Change
-$0.30 (-1.40%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.8M
TSPCF
Price
$1.81
Change
-$0.15 (-7.61%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNZA vs TSPCF

Header iconLNZA vs TSPCF Comparison
Open Charts LNZA vs TSPCFBanner chart's image
LanzaTech Global
Price$21.18
Change-$0.30 (-1.40%)
Volume$300
Capitalization49.8M
Cleanaway Waste Management
Price$1.81
Change-$0.15 (-7.61%)
Volume$572
Capitalization4.04B
LNZA vs TSPCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSPCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNZA vs. TSPCF commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNZA is a Buy and TSPCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (LNZA: $21.47 vs. TSPCF: $1.82)
Brand notoriety: LNZA and TSPCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNZA: 43% vs. TSPCF: 40%
Market capitalization -- LNZA: $49.8M vs. TSPCF: $4.04B
LNZA [@Environmental Services] is valued at $49.8M. TSPCF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $4.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $91.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNZA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSPCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LNZA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TSPCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LNZA is a better buy in the long-term than TSPCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNZA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSPCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNZA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • TSPCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSPCF is a better buy in the short-term than LNZA.

Price Growth

LNZA (@Environmental Services) experienced а -1.13% price change this week, while TSPCF (@Environmental Services) price change was -7.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-2.00% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSPCF($4.04B) has a higher market cap than LNZA($49.8M). TSPCF YTD gains are higher at: 10.671 vs. LNZA (-84.332).
LNZATSPCFLNZA / TSPCF
Capitalization49.8M4.04B1%
EBITDA-108.99MN/A-
Gain YTD-84.33210.671-790%
P/E RatioN/A39.82-
Revenue48.8MN/A-
Total Cash6.67KN/A-
Total Debt64.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TSPCF: Fundamental Ratings
TSPCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
48

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNZATSPCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSPCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPLPX22.92N/A
N/A
NYLI Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Class A
ASMMX31.23N/A
N/A
Invesco Summit A
FISRX2.41N/A
N/A
Franklin Income R
VILLX20.83N/A
N/A
Villere Balanced Inv
PSVKX18.40N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val R4

LNZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNZA has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNZA jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNZA
1D Price
Change %
LNZA100%
-3.55%
HAIUF - LNZA
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ABAT - LNZA
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.82%
MLAC - LNZA
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLH - LNZA
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
QRHC - LNZA
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.75%
More

TSPCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSPCF has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSPCF jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSPCF
1D Price
Change %
TSPCF100%
N/A
NVRI - TSPCF
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
CHFFY - TSPCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMRAF - TSPCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TESI - TSPCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.21%
LNZA - TSPCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
More