LNZA vs TSPCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNZA is a Hold and TSPCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNZA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTSPCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LNZA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TSPCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNZA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LNZA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
LNZA (@Environmental Services) experienced а -15.97% price change this week, while TSPCF (@Environmental Services) price change was +12.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -4.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
LNZA is expected to report earnings on Mar 29, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (-4.03% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| LNZA | TSPCF | LNZA / TSPCF | |
| Capitalization | 583M | 4.09B | 14% |
| EBITDA | -100.93M | 527M | -19% |
| Gain YTD | -82.796 | -1.829 | 4,526% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 75.76 | - |
| Revenue | 62.6M | 3.38B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 121M | 69.4M | 174% |
| Total Debt | 19.9M | 1.07B | 2% |
TSPCF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LNZA | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
LNZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNZA has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNZA jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNZA | 100% | +11.81% | ||
| HAIUF - LNZA | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CLH - LNZA | 25% Poorly correlated | +8.64% | ||
| MLAC - LNZA | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QRHC - LNZA | 22% Poorly correlated | +12.03% | ||
| PESI - LNZA | 22% Poorly correlated | +8.14% | ||
More | ||||
TSPCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSPCF has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSPCF jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSPCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSPCF | 100% | -3.01% | ||
| NVRI - TSPCF | 39% Loosely correlated | +17.83% | ||
| CHFFY - TSPCF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TMRAF - TSPCF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
| TESI - TSPCF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LNZA - TSPCF | 6% Poorly correlated | +11.81% | ||
More | ||||