LOB
Price
$28.21
Change
+$0.94 (+3.45%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
46 days until earnings call
PFS
Price
$16.77
Change
+$0.27 (+1.64%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOB vs PFS

Header iconLOB vs PFS Comparison
Open Charts LOB vs PFSBanner chart's image
Live Oak Bancshares
Price$28.21
Change+$0.94 (+3.45%)
Volume$196.58K
Capitalization1.86B
Provident Financial Services
Price$16.77
Change+$0.27 (+1.64%)
Volume$628.91K
Capitalization1.1B
LOB vs PFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
LOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOB vs. PFS commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOB is a StrongBuy and PFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LOB: $28.21 vs. PFS: $16.77)
Brand notoriety: LOB and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOB: 60% vs. PFS: 90%
Market capitalization -- LOB: $1.86B vs. PFS: $1.1B
LOB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.86B. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LOB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than LOB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the short-term than LOB.

Price Growth

LOB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.88% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOB($1.86B) has a higher market cap than PFS($1.1B). LOB has higher P/E ratio than PFS: LOB (24.73) vs PFS (8.49). PFS YTD gains are higher at: -8.762 vs. LOB (-28.527). LOB has more cash in the bank: 535M vs. PFS (189M). LOB has less debt than PFS: LOB (23.4M) vs PFS (1.46B). PFS has higher revenues than LOB: PFS (479M) vs LOB (434M).
LOBPFSLOB / PFS
Capitalization1.86B1.1B169%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-28.527-8.762326%
P/E Ratio24.738.49291%
Revenue434M479M91%
Total Cash535M189M283%
Total Debt23.4M1.46B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOB vs PFS: Fundamental Ratings
LOB
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8053
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7849
SMR RATING
1..100
109
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1512
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (31) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOB (80) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOB’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as LOB (78) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to LOB’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (9) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as LOB (10) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to LOB’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as LOB (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to LOB’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as LOB (15) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to LOB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOBPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIVOX12.67N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Value C
OTCBX22.57N/A
N/A
MFS Mid Cap Growth B
EDIIX11.02N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder I
BGVIX32.71N/A
N/A
Brandes Global Equity I
FIQHX43.32N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Europe Z

LOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOB has been closely correlated with CATY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOB jumps, then CATY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOB
1D Price
Change %
LOB100%
+3.45%
CATY - LOB
82%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
FFIN - LOB
81%
Closely correlated
+2.75%
HOPE - LOB
80%
Closely correlated
+3.02%
AUB - LOB
80%
Closely correlated
+2.03%
PFS - LOB
79%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
More

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with BHLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then BHLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
+1.64%
BHLB - PFS
91%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
HOPE - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
+3.02%
PPBI - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
+4.40%
UBSI - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
FFIN - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
+2.75%
More