LOCO
Price
$10.27
Change
-$0.35 (-3.30%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
308.64M
47 days until earnings call
NATH
Price
$111.55
Change
-$2.43 (-2.13%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
456.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOCO vs NATH

Header iconLOCO vs NATH Comparison
Open Charts LOCO vs NATHBanner chart's image
El Pollo Loco Holdings
Price$10.27
Change-$0.35 (-3.30%)
Volume$288.36K
Capitalization308.64M
Nathan's Famous
Price$111.55
Change-$2.43 (-2.13%)
Volume$31.04K
Capitalization456.18M
LOCO vs NATH Comparison Chart
Loading...
LOCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOCO vs. NATH commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOCO is a Hold and NATH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (LOCO: $10.27 vs. NATH: $111.55)
Brand notoriety: LOCO and NATH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOCO: 92% vs. NATH: 102%
Market capitalization -- LOCO: $308.64M vs. NATH: $456.18M
LOCO [@Restaurants] is valued at $308.64M. NATH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $456.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $215.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOCO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNATH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LOCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than LOCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOCO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NATH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the short-term than LOCO.

Price Growth

LOCO (@Restaurants) experienced а -7.06% price change this week, while NATH (@Restaurants) price change was +2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOCO is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

NATH is expected to report earnings on Jun 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.15% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NATH($456M) has a higher market cap than LOCO($309M). NATH has higher P/E ratio than LOCO: NATH (19.00) vs LOCO (11.94). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 42.626 vs. LOCO (-11.005). LOCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 56.2M vs. NATH (38.2M). NATH has more cash in the bank: 23.7M vs. LOCO (4.32M). NATH has less debt than LOCO: NATH (56.8M) vs LOCO (262M). LOCO has higher revenues than NATH: LOCO (476M) vs NATH (146M).
LOCONATHLOCO / NATH
Capitalization309M456M68%
EBITDA56.2M38.2M147%
Gain YTD-11.00542.626-26%
P/E Ratio11.9419.0063%
Revenue476M146M326%
Total Cash4.32M23.7M18%
Total Debt262M56.8M461%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOCO vs NATH: Fundamental Ratings
LOCO
NATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1323
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10010
SMR RATING
1..100
6940
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6422
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOCO's Valuation (61) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (66). This means that LOCO’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for LOCO (100). This means that NATH’s stock grew significantly faster than LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's SMR Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as LOCO (69). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as LOCO (51). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOCO (64). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOCONATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBNAX24.34N/A
N/A
Macquarie Balanced Fund Class A
JGAVX84.82N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Value R3
PZVIX12.40N/A
N/A
Pzena International Small Cap Value Inv
FAPLX12.91N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future M
FCUPX19.09-0.27
-1.39%
NYLI PineStone U.S. Equity Class P

LOCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOCO has been loosely correlated with DRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOCO jumps, then DRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOCO
1D Price
Change %
LOCO100%
-3.30%
DRI - LOCO
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
FRSH - LOCO
39%
Loosely correlated
-4.60%
RRGB - LOCO
38%
Loosely correlated
-9.85%
CAKE - LOCO
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.01%
NATH - LOCO
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
More

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with PZZA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then PZZA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
-2.13%
PZZA - NATH
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
LOCO - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.30%
DIN - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
PBPB - NATH
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
BROS - NATH
33%
Loosely correlated
-4.57%
More