Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOFLX vs RMEBX
LOFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LOFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3
Price$14.07
Change+$0.12 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.15M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.60
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
LOFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOFLX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LOFLX (38.1M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LOFLX: RMEBX (1.16) vs LOFLX (0.87). LOFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LOFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LOFLX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LOFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LOFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LOFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LOFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.47 vs. RMEBX (9.50). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 62.71 vs. LOFLX (14.71).
| LOFLX | RMEBX | LOFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.07 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.842 | 7.315 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.1M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.16 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.47 | 9.50 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.37 | 25.88 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.71 | 62.71 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement