Ad is loading...
LOFLX vs RMEBX
LOFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LOFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3
Price$12.58
Change+$0.85 (+7.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.77M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.86
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
LOFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. LOFLX (32.8M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LOFLX: RMEBX (1.18) vs LOFLX (0.91). LOFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LOFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LOFLX (1.63) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LOFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LOFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LOFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.56 vs. LOFLX (-5.28). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.36 vs. LOFLX (9.20).
| LOFLX | RMEBX | LOFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.07 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.002 | -7.747 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.8M | 92.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.18 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.28 | -4.56 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.81 | -1.07 | 2,030% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.20 | 44.36 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...