Ad is loading...
LOFLX vs RMFCX
LOFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LOFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3
Price$12.58
Change+$0.85 (+7.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.55M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.56
Change+$3.33 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
LOFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. LOFLX (30.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LOFLX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LOFLX (0.91). LOFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LOFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LOFLX (1.63) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LOFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LOFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LOFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.43 vs. LOFLX (-5.28). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. LOFLX (9.20).
| LOFLX | RMFCX | LOFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.91 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.002 | -7.697 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.6M | 92.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.34 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.28 | -4.43 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.81 | -0.65 | 3,355% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.20 | 45.42 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...