Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOFLX vs RMFCX
LOFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LOFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3
Price$14.07
Change+$0.12 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.15M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.27
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
LOFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOFLX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LOFLX (38.1M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LOFLX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LOFLX (0.87). LOFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LOFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LOFLX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LOFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LOFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LOFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LOFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.47 vs. RMFCX (9.64). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.87 vs. LOFLX (14.71).
| LOFLX | RMFCX | LOFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.91 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.842 | 7.403 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.1M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.31 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.47 | 9.64 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.37 | 26.42 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.71 | 63.87 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement