Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOFLX vs RWEBX
LOFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LOFLX vs RWEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3
Price$15.21
Change-$0.17 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.03M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.73
Change-$0.31 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.11B
LOFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOFLX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LOFLX (75M). LOFLX (0.78) and RWEBX (0.76) have matching dividends . LOFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LOFLX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LOFLX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LOFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). LOFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: LOFLX (0) vs RWEBX (250). LOFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.82 vs. RWEBX (4.44). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. LOFLX (14.07).
| LOFLX | RWEBX | LOFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.06 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.06 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.692 | 9.754 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.76 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.82 | 4.44 | 334% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.01 | 43.65 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.07 | 47.15 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement