Ad is loading...
LOGC
Price
$6.38
Change
+$0.11 (+1.75%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
LQDT
Price
$24.90
Change
-$0.11 (-0.44%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LOGC vs LQDT

Header iconLOGC vs LQDT Comparison
Open Charts LOGC vs LQDTBanner chart's image
ContextLogic
Price$6.38
Change+$0.11 (+1.75%)
Volume$198.26K
CapitalizationN/A
Liquidity Services
Price$24.90
Change-$0.11 (-0.44%)
Volume$172.27K
CapitalizationN/A
LOGC vs LQDT Comparison Chart
Loading...
LOGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOGC vs. LQDT commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOGC is a StrongSell and LQDT is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (LOGC: $6.39 vs. LQDT: $24.90)
Brand notoriety: LOGC and LQDT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOGC: 73% vs. LQDT: 167%
Market capitalization -- LOGC: $167.83M vs. LQDT: $760.26M
LOGC [@Internet Retail] is valued at $167.83M. LQDT’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $760.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.13T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $39.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOGC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLQDT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LOGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LQDT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the long-term than LOGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOGC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LQDT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LQDT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the short-term than LOGC.

Price Growth

LOGC (@Internet Retail) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while LQDT (@Internet Retail) price change was +1.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -3.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

LQDT is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-3.28% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LQDT($760M) has a higher market cap than LOGC($168M). LQDT YTD gains are higher at: 44.683 vs. LOGC (7.311). LQDT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 36.1M vs. LOGC (-221M). LOGC has more cash in the bank: 150M vs. LQDT (137M). LOGC has less debt than LQDT: LOGC (0) vs LQDT (15.4M). LQDT has higher revenues than LOGC: LQDT (336M) vs LOGC (156M).
LOGCLQDTLOGC / LQDT
Capitalization168M760M22%
EBITDA-221M36.1M-612%
Gain YTD7.31144.68316%
P/E RatioN/A40.16-
Revenue156M336M46%
Total Cash150M137M109%
Total Debt015.4M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOGC vs LQDT: Fundamental Ratings
LOGC
LQDT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10029
SMR RATING
1..100
9761
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10029
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
39n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOGC's Valuation (46) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LQDT (81) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that LOGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LQDT’s over the last 12 months.

LQDT's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for LOGC (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that LQDT’s stock grew significantly faster than LOGC’s over the last 12 months.

LQDT's SMR Rating (61) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOGC (97) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that LQDT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOGC’s over the last 12 months.

LQDT's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as LOGC (43) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that LQDT’s stock grew similarly to LOGC’s over the last 12 months.

LQDT's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for LOGC (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that LQDT’s stock grew significantly faster than LOGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOGCLQDT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LOGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDIIX15.64-0.08
-0.51%
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx Inv A
TSMVX31.86-0.26
-0.81%
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value I2
CIVCX16.55-0.15
-0.90%
American Funds International Vntg 529-E
JOGEX14.68-0.27
-1.81%
JOHCM Global Select Advisor
VRSCX24.08-0.56
-2.27%
Voya SmallCap Opportunities Port R6

LOGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOGC has been closely correlated with EPIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOGC jumps, then EPIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOGC
1D Price
Change %
LOGC100%
+1.67%
EPIX - LOGC
67%
Closely correlated
-2.27%
TSHA - LOGC
45%
Loosely correlated
-9.25%
PCVX - LOGC
45%
Loosely correlated
-6.31%
ATNM - LOGC
43%
Loosely correlated
-9.09%
LGND - LOGC
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.24%
More

LQDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LQDT has been loosely correlated with BYON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LQDT jumps, then BYON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQDT
1D Price
Change %
LQDT100%
-0.44%
BYON - LQDT
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
EBAY - LQDT
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
CVNA - LQDT
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
CPNG - LQDT
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
LOGC - LQDT
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
More