Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOGVX vs PBDAX
LOGVX vs PBDAX Comparison
Open Charts LOGVX vs PBDAX
Lord Abbett Income F3
Price$2.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.8B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond A
Price$9.05
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.15B
LOGVX vs PBDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOGVX vs. PBDAX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOGVX is a Hold and PBDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBDAX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LOGVX (5.8B). LOGVX pays higher dividends than PBDAX: LOGVX (5.89) vs PBDAX (4.15). LOGVX was incepted earlier than PBDAX: LOGVX (8 years) vs PBDAX (21 years). PBDAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than LOGVX (0.45). PBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. LOGVX (190.00). LOGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBDAX: LOGVX (0) vs PBDAX (1000). PBDAX (6.21) and LOGVX (5.97) have marching annual gain over last year. LOGVX return over 5 years is better than : 6.41 vs. PBDAX (-1.04).
| LOGVX | PBDAX | LOGVX / PBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.49 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.49 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.343 | 3.642 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.8B | 12.1B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.89 | 4.15 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.97 | 6.21 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.29 | 14.99 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.41 | -1.04 | -615% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.35 | - |