Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOGVX vs PCNNX
LOGVX vs PCNNX Comparison
Open Charts LOGVX vs PCNNX
Lord Abbett Income F3
Price$2.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.8B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$9.05
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.15B
LOGVX vs PCNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOGVX vs. PCNNX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOGVX is a Hold and PCNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LOGVX (5.8B). LOGVX pays higher dividends than PCNNX: LOGVX (5.89) vs PCNNX (4.40). LOGVX was incepted earlier than PCNNX: LOGVX (8 years) vs PCNNX (7 years). PCNNX (1.29) is less costly to investors than LOGVX (0.45). PCNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. LOGVX (190.00). LOGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: LOGVX (0) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.47 vs. LOGVX (5.97). LOGVX return over 5 years is better than : 6.41 vs. PCNNX (0.21).
| LOGVX | PCNNX | LOGVX / PCNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.24 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.29 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.343 | 3.749 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.8B | 12.1B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.89 | 4.40 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.97 | 6.47 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.29 | 15.86 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.41 | 0.21 | 3,127% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |