Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOGWX vs WCMLX
LOGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LOGWX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F3
Price$34.56
Change+$0.39 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.09B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.89
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.16M
LOGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOGWX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOGWX has more cash in the bank: 2.09B vs. WCMLX (44.2M). LOGWX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LOGWX (0.18) vs WCMLX (0.00). LOGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LOGWX (9 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LOGWX (0.59). LOGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LOGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LOGWX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LOGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.88 vs. WCMLX (4.91). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 16.12 vs. LOGWX (-4.32).
| LOGWX | WCMLX | LOGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.99 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.79 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.938 | 8.087 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 44.2M | 4,722% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.88 | 4.91 | 303% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.01 | 36.54 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.32 | 16.12 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |