Ad is loading...
LOGWX vs WCMLX
LOGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LOGWX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F3
Price$26.50
Change+$0.12 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.80
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
LOGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOGWX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOGWX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. WCMLX (42.1M). LOGWX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LOGWX (0.24) vs WCMLX (0.00). LOGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LOGWX (8 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LOGWX (0.59). LOGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LOGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LOGWX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LOGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.44 vs. WCMLX (-6.86). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.31 vs. LOGWX (2.01).
| LOGWX | WCMLX | LOGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.99 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.86 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.037 | -9.253 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 42.1M | 4,292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.44 | -6.86 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.13 | 15.89 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.01 | 21.31 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |