Ad is loading...
LOGWX vs WCMLX
LOGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LOGWX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F3
Price$24.17
Change+$0.47 (+1.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.78
Change+$0.16 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.46M
LOGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOGWX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOGWX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. WCMLX (38.5M). LOGWX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LOGWX (0.25) vs WCMLX (0.00). LOGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LOGWX (8 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LOGWX (0.59). LOGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). LOGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LOGWX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LOGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.86 vs. WCMLX (-17.03). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 24.50 vs. LOGWX (9.62).
| LOGWX | WCMLX | LOGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.99 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.86 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.974 | -17.418 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 38.5M | 4,275% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.86 | -17.03 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.96 | -9.46 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.62 | 24.50 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers