Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOLDX vs MNSGX
LOLDX vs MNSGX Comparison
Open Charts LOLDX vs MNSGX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F3
Price$3.91
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.18B
Allspring Short Duration Govt Bd Adm
Price$9.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.08M
LOLDX vs MNSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOLDX vs. MNSGX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOLDX is a Hold and MNSGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOLDX has more cash in the bank: 43.2B vs. MNSGX (208M). LOLDX pays higher dividends than MNSGX: LOLDX (5.31) vs MNSGX (4.33). LOLDX was incepted earlier than MNSGX: LOLDX (8 years) vs MNSGX (33 years). MNSGX (0.81) is less costly to investors than LOLDX (0.32). MNSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. LOLDX (92.00). LOLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNSGX: LOLDX (0) vs MNSGX (1000000). LOLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. MNSGX (4.22). LOLDX return over 5 years is better than : 14.71 vs. MNSGX (5.95).
| LOLDX | MNSGX | LOLDX / MNSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.60 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.81 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.732 | 4.077 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.2B | 208M | 20,769% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.31 | 4.33 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.49 | 4.22 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.84 | 13.25 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.71 | 5.95 | 247% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers