LOMLF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
58.33M
MAGE
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.72M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOMLF vs MAGE

Header iconLOMLF vs MAGE Comparison
Open Charts LOMLF vs MAGEBanner chart's image
Lion One Metals
Price$0.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$314.13K
Capitalization58.33M
Magellan Copper and Gold
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.72M
LOMLF vs MAGE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LOMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAGE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOMLF vs. MAGE commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOMLF is a StrongBuy and MAGE is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (LOMLF: $0.20 vs. MAGE: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: LOMLF and MAGE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOMLF: 114% vs. MAGE: 2%
Market capitalization -- LOMLF: $57.03M vs. MAGE: $2.72M
LOMLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $57.03M. MAGE’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAGE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LOMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAGE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOMLF is a better buy in the long-term than MAGE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOMLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAGE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOMLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAGE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAGE is a better buy in the short-term than LOMLF.

Price Growth

LOMLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.69% price change this week, while MAGE (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3358.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.22% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOMLF($58.3M) has a higher market cap than MAGE($2.72M). MAGE YTD gains are higher at: 17.059 vs. LOMLF (9.622). LOMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.56M vs. MAGE (-738.1K). LOMLF has more cash in the bank: 12.9M vs. MAGE (5.8K). MAGE has less debt than LOMLF: MAGE (859K) vs LOMLF (51.8M). LOMLF has higher revenues than MAGE: LOMLF (51M) vs MAGE (0).
LOMLFMAGELOMLF / MAGE
Capitalization58.3M2.72M2,140%
EBITDA3.56M-738.1K-482%
Gain YTD9.62217.05956%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue51M0-
Total Cash12.9M5.8K222,491%
Total Debt51.8M859K6,030%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOMLF vs MAGE: Fundamental Ratings
LOMLF
MAGE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1030
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6192
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMLF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAGE (95). This means that LOMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

LOMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (100). This means that LOMLF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

LOMLF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (100). This means that LOMLF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

LOMLF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (92). This means that LOMLF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

LOMLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (100). This means that LOMLF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOMLFMAGE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAGE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMOIF3.100.10
+3.33%
Harbour Energy Plc
NNDNF21.80N/A
N/A
Nidec Corp.
PYPTF9.39N/A
N/A
Paypoint plc
NSRCF0.31N/A
N/A
Nextsource Materials Inc.
AVFCF0.27N/A
N/A
ADVFN plc

LOMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMLF has been loosely correlated with HMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMLF jumps, then HMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMLF
1D Price
Change %
LOMLF100%
+0.41%
HMY - LOMLF
41%
Loosely correlated
-14.04%
KGC - LOMLF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
EGO - LOMLF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
AEM - LOMLF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
AGI - LOMLF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More

MAGE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAGE and MAIFF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAGE and MAIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAGE
1D Price
Change %
MAGE100%
+10.56%
MAIFF - MAGE
9%
Poorly correlated
+5.12%
LONCF - MAGE
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
LOMLF - MAGE
-5%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
MAKOF - MAGE
-7%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%