LONCF
Price
$0.43
Change
+$0.01 (+2.38%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
36.39M
MAGE
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.02 (+16.67%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
3.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LONCF vs MAGE

Header iconLONCF vs MAGE Comparison
Open Charts LONCF vs MAGEBanner chart's image
LONCOR GOLD
Price$0.43
Change+$0.01 (+2.38%)
Volume$472.46K
Capitalization36.39M
Magellan Copper and Gold
Price$0.14
Change+$0.02 (+16.67%)
Volume$23.92K
Capitalization3.41M
LONCF vs MAGE Comparison Chart
Loading...
LONCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LONCF vs. MAGE commentary
Jun 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LONCF is a Hold and MAGE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2025
Stock price -- (LONCF: $0.43 vs. MAGE: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: LONCF and MAGE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LONCF: 147% vs. MAGE: 293%
Market capitalization -- LONCF: $36.39M vs. MAGE: $3.41M
LONCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $36.39M. MAGE’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LONCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAGE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LONCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAGE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LONCF is a better buy in the long-term than MAGE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LONCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LONCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

LONCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.19% price change this week, while MAGE (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAGE is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LONCF($36.4M) has a higher market cap than MAGE($3.41M). MAGE YTD gains are higher at: 60.235 vs. LONCF (17.238). MAGE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -531.64K vs. LONCF (-2.44M). LONCF has more cash in the bank: 180K vs. MAGE (2.14K). LONCF has less debt than MAGE: LONCF (567K) vs MAGE (903K). LONCF (0) and MAGE (0) have equivalent revenues.
LONCFMAGELONCF / MAGE
Capitalization36.4M3.41M1,067%
EBITDA-2.44M-531.64K459%
Gain YTD17.23860.23529%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash180K2.14K8,396%
Total Debt567K903K63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LONCF vs MAGE: Fundamental Ratings
LONCF
MAGE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6389
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAGE's Valuation (96) in the null industry is in the same range as LONCF (100). This means that MAGE’s stock grew similarly to LONCF’s over the last 12 months.

LONCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (100). This means that LONCF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

LONCF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (100). This means that LONCF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

LONCF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (60). This means that LONCF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

LONCF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (100). This means that LONCF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LONCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LONCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGP104.624.97
+4.99%
DB Gold Double Long ETN
AMAX7.820.07
+0.94%
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
FAD140.180.73
+0.52%
First Trust Multi Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
FNOV48.560.06
+0.13%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Nov
PAVE41.550.04
+0.10%
Global X US Infrastructure Dev ETF

LONCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LONCF and CAMNF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LONCF and CAMNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LONCF
1D Price
Change %
LONCF100%
+2.59%
CAMNF - LONCF
29%
Poorly correlated
+15.00%
ORZCF - LONCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+11.94%
WFRSF - LONCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+9.20%
MAIFF - LONCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
MAGE - LONCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More