LONCF
Price
$0.43
Change
-$0.01 (-2.27%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
36.39M
WFRSF
Price
$1.28
Change
-$0.47 (-26.86%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
611.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LONCF vs WFRSF

Header iconLONCF vs WFRSF Comparison
Open Charts LONCF vs WFRSFBanner chart's image
LONCOR GOLD
Price$0.43
Change-$0.01 (-2.27%)
Volume$358.89K
Capitalization36.39M
West African Resources
Price$1.28
Change-$0.47 (-26.86%)
Volume$6.93K
Capitalization611.65M
LONCF vs WFRSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LONCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LONCF vs. WFRSF commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LONCF is a Hold and WFRSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LONCF: $0.43 vs. WFRSF: $1.44)
Brand notoriety: LONCF and WFRSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LONCF: 113% vs. WFRSF: 42%
Market capitalization -- LONCF: $36.39M vs. WFRSF: $611.65M
LONCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $36.39M. WFRSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $611.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LONCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWFRSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LONCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WFRSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WFRSF is a better buy in the long-term than LONCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LONCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LONCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

LONCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.71% price change this week, while WFRSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -13.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFRSF($612M) has a higher market cap than LONCF($36.4M). WFRSF YTD gains are higher at: 58.242 vs. LONCF (15.416). WFRSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 319M vs. LONCF (-2.44M). WFRSF has more cash in the bank: 173M vs. LONCF (180K). LONCF has less debt than WFRSF: LONCF (567K) vs WFRSF (22.2M). WFRSF has higher revenues than LONCF: WFRSF (606M) vs LONCF (0).
LONCFWFRSFLONCF / WFRSF
Capitalization36.4M612M6%
EBITDA-2.44M319M-1%
Gain YTD15.41658.24226%
P/E RatioN/A5.19-
Revenue0606M-
Total Cash180K173M0%
Total Debt567K22.2M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LONCF vs WFRSF: Fundamental Ratings
LONCF
WFRSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6431
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8631
SMR RATING
1..100
9540
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2234
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFRSF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LONCF (100). This means that WFRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LONCF’s over the last 12 months.

WFRSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LONCF (86). This means that WFRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LONCF’s over the last 12 months.

WFRSF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LONCF (95). This means that WFRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LONCF’s over the last 12 months.

WFRSF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as LONCF (42). This means that WFRSF’s stock grew similarly to LONCF’s over the last 12 months.

LONCF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as WFRSF (34). This means that LONCF’s stock grew similarly to WFRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LONCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LONCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
META687.9521.10
+3.16%
Meta Platforms
TSLX23.21-0.14
-0.60%
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
OLP24.67-0.16
-0.64%
One Liberty Properties
PYXS1.28-0.04
-3.03%
Pyxis Oncology
PPC47.64-1.54
-3.13%
Pilgrim's Pride Corp

LONCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LONCF and CAMNF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LONCF and CAMNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LONCF
1D Price
Change %
LONCF100%
-2.29%
CAMNF - LONCF
29%
Poorly correlated
+14.07%
ORZCF - LONCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
WFRSF - LONCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-17.71%
MAIFF - LONCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.92%
MAGE - LONCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WFRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WFRSF and VLMZF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WFRSF and VLMZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFRSF
1D Price
Change %
WFRSF100%
-17.71%
VLMZF - WFRSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUCRF - WFRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LONCF - WFRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
XTGRF - WFRSF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XXMMF - WFRSF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More