Ad is loading...
LOW
Price
$269.40
Change
-$0.95 (-0.35%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
2 days until earnings call
RH
Price
$315.70
Change
-$7.13 (-2.21%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
17 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LOW vs RH

Header iconLOW vs RH Comparison
Open Charts LOW vs RHBanner chart's image
Lowe's Companies
Price$269.40
Change-$0.95 (-0.35%)
Volume$2.26M
CapitalizationN/A
RH
Price$315.70
Change-$7.13 (-2.21%)
Volume$451.53K
CapitalizationN/A
LOW vs RH Comparison Chart
Loading...
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOW vs. RH commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOW is a Sell and RH is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (LOW: $269.40 vs. RH: $315.70)
Brand notoriety: LOW and RH are both notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOW: 104% vs. RH: 59%
Market capitalization -- LOW: $145.75B vs. RH: $6.38B
LOW [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $145.75B. RH’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $6.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LOW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOW is a better buy in the long-term than RH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOW is a better buy in the short-term than RH.

Price Growth

LOW (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.63% price change this week, while RH (@Specialty Stores) price change was -5.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOW is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

RH is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.43% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOW($146B) has a higher market cap than RH($6.38B). RH has higher P/E ratio than LOW: RH (56.64) vs LOW (18.88). LOW YTD gains are higher at: 23.356 vs. RH (8.309). LOW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.6B vs. RH (524M). LOW has more cash in the bank: 921M vs. RH (124M). RH has less debt than LOW: RH (3.72B) vs LOW (40.1B). LOW has higher revenues than RH: LOW (86.4B) vs RH (3.03B).
LOWRHLOW / RH
Capitalization146B6.38B2,289%
EBITDA13.6B524M2,595%
Gain YTD23.3568.309281%
P/E Ratio18.8856.6433%
Revenue86.4B3.03B2,852%
Total Cash921M124M743%
Total Debt40.1B3.72B1,079%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOW vs RH: Fundamental Ratings
LOW
RH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1457
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1372
SMR RATING
1..100
733
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
502
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOW's Valuation (9) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is significantly better than the same rating for RH (92) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew significantly faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RH (72) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's SMR Rating (7) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as RH (33) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as RH (49) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

RH's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOW (50) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that RH’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOWRH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OACP22.720.01
+0.06%
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF
EEMD20.08N/A
N/A
AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF
JPMB38.80-0.10
-0.25%
JPMorgan USD Emerging Mkts Svr Bd ETF
XJUL35.28-0.11
-0.32%
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Jul
VAW204.10-1.42
-0.69%
Vanguard Materials ETF

LOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOW
1D Price
Change %
LOW100%
-0.35%
HD - LOW
87%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
FND - LOW
72%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
KMX - LOW
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
RH - LOW
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
CPRT - LOW
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
More

RH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RH has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RH jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RH
1D Price
Change %
RH100%
-2.21%
CPRT - RH
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
LOW - RH
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
CWH - RH
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
WSM - RH
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
HNST - RH
56%
Loosely correlated
+6.31%
More