Advertisement
RH vs WSM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Restoration Hardware (RH) vs. Williams-Sonoma (WSM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- RH has experienced significant volatility in recent weeks, with shares declining over 20% in the past month amid insider selling and upcoming earnings.
- WSM has demonstrated greater stability, posting positive year-to-date returns near 28% and recent quarterly results that exceeded expectations.
- Both companies operate in the home furnishings retail sector, but WSM maintains a larger market capitalization of approximately $27 billion compared to RH's roughly $2.8 billion.
- RH focuses on luxury home furnishings with recent expansions including international galleries and partnerships, while WSM leverages multiple premium brands across omni-channel retail.
- Relative performance shows WSM with stronger recent momentum and lower volatility than RH over the trailing periods.
- Market sentiment reflects cautious optimism for both amid housing market dynamics, with WSM exhibiting more consistent trend behavior.
Introduction
This comparison examines RH (Restoration Hardware) and WSM (Williams-Sonoma), two specialty retailers in the home furnishings space. Traders and investors focused on consumer discretionary stocks, sector rotation strategies, or relative value analysis may find this overview useful for assessing positioning in the current market environment characterized by housing trends and retail sentiment shifts.
RH Overview and Recent Performance
RH is a luxury home furnishings retailer offering curated collections through galleries and digital channels. In recent market activity, shares have faced pressure, declining substantially over the past month amid broader sector challenges and notable insider share sales. Developments such as executive appointments, a Goldman Sachs rating upgrade, and new collaborations including with Mercedes-AMG PETRONAS Formula One Team have influenced sentiment. Upcoming second-quarter fiscal 2027 earnings on September 10, 2026, remain a key near-term catalyst as the company navigates housing market conditions.
WSM Overview and Recent Performance
WSM operates as a multi-channel specialty retailer with premium brands including Williams-Sonoma and Pottery Barn. Recent performance has shown resilience, with shares delivering solid year-to-date gains and a recent quarterly report that surpassed consensus estimates on both revenue and earnings. The company has maintained positive momentum through consistent comparable sales growth and operational execution. Broader market activity reflects steady investor interest supported by its diversified brand portfolio and omni-channel capabilities.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights select AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that trade thousands of different tickers. Only the highest-performing and most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this curated section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with statistics often showing varied win rates, drawdowns, and returns across different market regimes. This resource provides traders with data-driven options tailored to current conditions. Explore Trending AI Robots for detailed bot profiles and performance insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
RH and WSM share exposure to the home furnishings retail sector but differ in scale, business model, and recent trajectory. WSM benefits from a broader brand portfolio and larger market capitalization, supporting more stable revenue streams and higher profitability margins. In contrast, RH emphasizes luxury positioning with potential for higher growth through gallery expansions and partnerships, though this comes with greater volatility and sensitivity to discretionary spending. Recent momentum favors WSM with positive year-to-date returns and earnings beats, while RH has encountered sharper pullbacks. Risk factors for both include housing market softness, yet WSM demonstrates lower beta and more consistent trend stability. Market sentiment reflects divergent positioning, with WSM appearing better aligned for resilience in uncertain retail environments.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, relative stability, and recent positive momentum, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a higher probabilistic favorability to WSM in the current environment. Its stronger year-to-date performance and earnings delivery suggest more reliable positioning compared to the heightened volatility observed in RH. This assessment remains probabilistic and subject to evolving market data.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsTo compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RH is a Hold and WSM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWSM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- RH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WSM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- WSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
RH (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -1.41% price change this week, while WSM (@Specialty Stores) price change was +2.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
RH is expected to report earnings on Sep 10, 2026.
WSM is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+2.69% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| RH | WSM | RH / WSM | |
| Capitalization | 2.7B | 26.8B | 10% |
| EBITDA | 520M | 1.77B | 29% |
| Gain YTD | -20.486 | 28.913 | -71% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.50 | 23.37 | 118% |
| Revenue | 3.43B | 8.01B | 43% |
| Total Cash | 53.8M | 1.03B | 5% |
| Total Debt | 4.02B | 1.53B | 263% |
RH | WSM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RH's Valuation (81) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WSM (93). This means that RH’s stock grew similarly to WSM’s over the last 12 months.
WSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RH (100). This means that WSM’s stock grew significantly faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.
WSM's SMR Rating (20) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (33). This means that WSM’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.
WSM's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (64). This means that WSM’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.
WSM's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RH (93). This means that WSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.
| RH | WSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IREG | 10.20 | 0.93 | +10.03% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF | |||
| TMYY | 22.56 | 0.10 | +0.42% |
| GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSM ETF | |||
| KOMP | 67.71 | 0.03 | +0.04% |
| Stt Strt®SPDR®S&PKenshoNwEcosComposETF | |||
| TDI | 47.60 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Touchstone Dynamic International ETF | |||
| LSAF | 55.15 | -0.94 | -1.68% |
| LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor® US Cr Eq ETF | |||
RH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RH has been loosely correlated with FND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RH jumps, then FND could also see price increases.
WSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSM has been loosely correlated with FND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WSM jumps, then FND could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSM | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| FND - WSM | 65% Loosely correlated | -4.60% | ||
| CPRT - WSM | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.32% | ||
| RH - WSM | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.74% | ||
| ARHS - WSM | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.98% | ||
| LOW - WSM | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
More | ||||