Advertisement
RH vs WSM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? RH (RH) vs. Williams-Sonoma (WSM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- RH and Williams-Sonoma operate in the home furnishings sector but target different segments, with RH focused on luxury and Williams-Sonoma on broader premium retail.
- Over recent weeks, WSM has demonstrated stronger earnings momentum following its Q1 2026 results, while RH has faced greater volatility amid tariff pressures and mixed earnings.
- WSM stock has shown more consistent relative performance year-to-date compared to RH, which trades at a deeper discount to its recent highs.
- Both companies benefit from housing market dynamics, yet WSM's diversified brand portfolio and operational margins provide a buffer against sector headwinds.
- Market sentiment favors stability in WSM, reflected in analyst price target adjustments, whereas RH's higher beta exposes it to sharper swings.
- Relative positioning highlights trade-offs between RH's growth potential in luxury cycles and WSM's track record of steady execution.
Introduction
Investors and traders often compare RH and WSM to assess opportunities within the consumer discretionary sector, particularly home furnishings. These stocks appeal to those evaluating relative performance, sector exposure, and resilience in varying economic conditions. The comparison is relevant for market participants seeking to understand how luxury versus premium retail positioning influences stock behavior amid shifting consumer spending and macroeconomic factors.
RH Overview and Recent Performance
RH (RH Inc., formerly Restoration Hardware) is a luxury home furnishings retailer known for high-end furniture, lighting, and décor. In recent market activity, the stock has exhibited notable volatility, trading within a 52-week range of approximately $106 to $257. Recent weeks have seen pressure from tariff-related cost concerns and an earlier earnings report that included an EPS miss despite revenue growth of 8.1% year-over-year. The shares have traded at a discount to prior highs, with performance influenced by broader housing market sensitivity and luxury spending patterns.
WSM Overview and Recent Performance
WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) operates a portfolio of premium home and kitchen brands, including Williams Sonoma, Pottery Barn, and West Elm. Recent market activity has been supported by strong Q1 2026 results, with comparable brand revenue growth of 4.8%, an operating margin of 16.2%, and EPS of $1.93 that exceeded expectations. The stock has maintained steadier momentum, with year-to-date returns competitive within the sector and analyst price targets seeing modest upward revisions in late May 2026.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions earn placement in the trending section, where users can review statistics such as win rates, drawdowns, and returns tailored to specific assets. All AI trading bots feature distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and sets of tickers they trade. Explore the full range on the Trending AI Robots page to identify options aligned with individual preferences.
Head-to-Head Comparison
RH emphasizes luxury positioning with higher price points and greater sensitivity to affluent consumer trends, while WSM offers broader premium accessibility across multiple brands, supporting more diversified revenue streams. Growth drivers for RH include potential brand extensions and housing recovery, contrasted with WSM’s focus on operational efficiency and brand collaborations. Recent momentum has favored WSM following earnings beats, whereas RH has contended with greater price swings tied to tariffs and cyclical demand. Risk factors include RH’s elevated volatility versus WSM’s more moderate beta. Sector exposure is similar, yet market sentiment has tilted toward WSM’s demonstrated stability and capital return programs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic favorability to WSM. This assessment reflects WSM’s stronger recent execution and lower volatility profile compared to RH, though outcomes remain subject to evolving economic conditions and sector dynamics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RH is a Hold and WSM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWSM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- RH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WSM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
RH (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +4.37% price change this week, while WSM (@Specialty Stores) price change was +9.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +7.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
RH is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.
WSM is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+7.13% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| RH | WSM | RH / WSM | |
| Capitalization | 2.89B | 26.3B | 11% |
| EBITDA | 544M | 1.65B | 33% |
| Gain YTD | -14.574 | 26.064 | -56% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.54 | 25.06 | 118% |
| Revenue | 3.44B | 7.88B | 44% |
| Total Cash | 41.2M | 652M | 6% |
| Total Debt | 3.97B | 1.49B | 266% |
RH | WSM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 44 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RH's Valuation (89) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WSM (93). This means that RH’s stock grew similarly to WSM’s over the last 12 months.
WSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RH (100). This means that WSM’s stock grew significantly faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.
WSM's SMR Rating (19) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (33). This means that WSM’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.
WSM's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (47). This means that WSM’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.
WSM's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RH (88). This means that WSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.
| RH | WSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 75% | 8 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLV | 81.46 | 0.61 | +0.76% |
| American Century Foc Lrg Cp Val ETF | |||
| AQLT | 31.17 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF | |||
| SCYB | 26.16 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | |||
| DEED | 21.33 | -0.01 | -0.07% |
| First Trust Securitized Plus ETF | |||
| OSCX | 102.90 | -5.12 | -4.74% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OSCR ETF | |||
RH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RH has been loosely correlated with FND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RH jumps, then FND could also see price increases.
WSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSM has been loosely correlated with FND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WSM jumps, then FND could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSM | 100% | +2.19% | ||
| FND - WSM | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| RH - WSM | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| CPRT - WSM | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| ARHS - WSM | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| LOW - WSM | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||