Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOWV vs RECS
LOWV vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LOWV vs RECS
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
Price$72.85
Change-$0.24 (-0.33%)
Volume$18.28K
Net Assets122.05M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.50
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
Volume$370.39K
Net Assets2.89B
LOWV vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOWV vs. RECS commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOWV is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.89B vs. LOWV (122M). LOWV has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: LOWV (3.574) vs RECS (2.542). LOWV was incepted earlier than RECS: LOWV (2 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LOWV (0.39). RECS has a higher turnover LOWV (30.00) vs LOWV (30.00).
| LOWV | RECS | LOWV / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 3.574 | 2.542 | 141% |
| Net Assets | 122M | 2.89B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.15 | 260% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 49.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 0.89 | 0.69 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LOWV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 48% | 30 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LOWV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOWV has been closely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOWV jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LOWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOWV | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| CPAY - LOWV | 74% Closely correlated | -3.95% | ||
| J - LOWV | 66% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| CRM - LOWV | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| SHW - LOWV | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| TSM - LOWV | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
More | ||||