Ad is loading...
LOWV vs RECS
LOWV vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LOWV vs RECS
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
Price$62.60
Change-$1.16 (-1.82%)
Volume$129
Net Assets93.99M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$29.47
Change-$0.50 (-1.67%)
Volume$4.8K
Net Assets2.06B
LOWV vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOWV vs. RECS commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOWV is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.06B vs. LOWV (94M). LOWV has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: LOWV (-9.355) vs RECS (-13.432). LOWV was incepted earlier than RECS: LOWV (2 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LOWV (0.48). RECS has a higher turnover LOWV (30.00) vs LOWV (30.00).
| LOWV | RECS | LOWV / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -9.355 | -13.432 | 70% |
| Net Assets | 94M | 2.06B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.15 | 320% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 49.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 0.92 | 0.73 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LOWV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LOWV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOWV has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOWV jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LOWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOWV | 100% | -1.03% | ||
| CPAY - LOWV | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| KLAC - LOWV | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.87% | ||
| J - LOWV | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| TXN - LOWV | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| TSM - LOWV | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -2.98% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||