Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPEFX vs RSLFX
LPEFX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts LPEFX vs RSLFX
LPEFX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPEFX vs. RSLFX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPEFX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. LPEFX (42.7M). LPEFX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: LPEFX (5.23) vs RSLFX (0.81). LPEFX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: LPEFX (19 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). LPEFX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LPEFX (31.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPEFX: RSLFX (250) vs LPEFX (2500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. LPEFX (-16.72). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.47 vs. LPEFX (-15.57).
| LPEFX | RSLFX | LPEFX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.70 | 289% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.70 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.921 | 12.524 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.23 | 0.81 | 643% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.72 | 9.55 | -175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.16 | 39.09 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.57 | -7.47 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.70 | 90.43 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers