LPENF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
QBAK
Price
$3.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

LPENF vs QBAK

Header iconLPENF vs QBAK Comparison
Open Charts LPENF vs QBAKBanner chart's image
Loop Energy
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$113
CapitalizationN/A
Qualstar
Price$3.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.94K
CapitalizationN/A
LPENF vs QBAK Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LPENF vs. QBAK commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPENF is a Hold and QBAK is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (LPENF: $0.08 vs. QBAK: $3.60)
Brand notoriety: LPENF and QBAK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electrical Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LPENF: 100% vs. QBAK: 244%
Market capitalization -- LPENF: $14.76M vs. QBAK: $4.24M
LPENF [@Electrical Products] is valued at $14.76M. QBAK’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $4.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $181.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $4.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LPENF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQBAK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LPENF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QBAK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LPENF and QBAK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

LPENF (@Electrical Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QBAK (@Electrical Products) price change was -13.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

QBAK is expected to report earnings on Aug 16, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (+1.16% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LPENF($14.8M) has a higher market cap than QBAK($4.24M). LPENF YTD gains are higher at: -11.111 vs. QBAK (-19.101). QBAK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -370K vs. LPENF (-34.18M). LPENF has more cash in the bank: 13.2M vs. QBAK (3.65M). QBAK has less debt than LPENF: QBAK (629K) vs LPENF (7.74M). QBAK has higher revenues than LPENF: QBAK (12.6M) vs LPENF (4.05M).
LPENFQBAKLPENF / QBAK
Capitalization14.8M4.24M349%
EBITDA-34.18M-370K9,237%
Gain YTD-11.111-19.10158%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4.05M12.6M32%
Total Cash13.2M3.65M362%
Total Debt7.74M629K1,230%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QBAK: Fundamental Ratings
QBAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLSCX23.100.01
+0.04%
Hartford Disciplined Equity HLS IC
DFQTX40.03-0.06
-0.15%
DFA US Core Equity 2 I
FNKFX17.39-0.05
-0.29%
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6
LICRX14.91-0.10
-0.67%
Lord Abbett International Equity R3
OFSAX23.56-0.17
-0.72%
Olstein Strategic Opportunities A

LPENF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPENF has been loosely correlated with XPPLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LPENF jumps, then XPPLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LPENF
1D Price
Change %
LPENF100%
N/A
XPPLF - LPENF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ELVA - LPENF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
QBAK - LPENF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFLI - LPENF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
RAYA - LPENF
-7%
Poorly correlated
-4.69%
More

QBAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QBAK and RAYA have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBAK and RAYA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBAK
1D Price
Change %
QBAK100%
N/A
RAYA - QBAK
14%
Poorly correlated
-4.69%
ELVA - QBAK
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
LPENF - QBAK
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFLI - QBAK
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
ABBNY - QBAK
-8%
Poorly correlated
N/A