Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs RSLBX
LPFAX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs RSLBX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$6.85
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.3M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$62.19
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.4B
LPFAX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. RSLBX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 79.4B vs. LPFAX (59.3M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: LPFAX (11.03) vs RSLBX (0.06). LPFAX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: LPFAX (7 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). LPFAX (2.72) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). LPFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFAX: RSLBX (250) vs LPFAX (2500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.04 vs. LPFAX (7.65). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.76 vs. RSLBX (13.50).
| LPFAX | RSLBX | LPFAX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 1.75 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 1.75 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.047 | 9.112 | 66% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.3M | 79.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.03 | 0.06 | 19,014% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | 9.04 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.42 | 29.89 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.76 | 13.50 | 339% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.49 | - |