Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs RSLBX
LPFAX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs RSLBX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$6.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.91M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$61.67
Change+$0.35 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.12B
LPFAX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. RSLBX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. LPFAX (57.9M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: LPFAX (11.03) vs RSLBX (0.06). LPFAX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: LPFAX (7 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). LPFAX (2.72) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). LPFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFAX: RSLBX (250) vs LPFAX (2500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. LPFAX (7.12). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.34 vs. RSLBX (15.32).
| LPFAX | RSLBX | LPFAX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 1.75 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 1.75 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.721 | 8.200 | 45% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.9M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.03 | 0.06 | 19,014% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.12 | 9.58 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.73 | 32.14 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.34 | 15.32 | 322% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.42 | - |