Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSEBX
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSEBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.64
Change-$0.01 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.38M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.88
Change+$0.69 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.82B
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. LPFCX (57.4M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: LPFCX (12.61) vs RSEBX (0.23). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). LPFCX (3.41) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSEBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.05 vs. LPFCX (2.80). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. RSEBX (14.22).
| LPFCX | RSEBX | LPFCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 1.45 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.41 | 1.45 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.727 | 10.573 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.4M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 12.61 | 0.23 | 5,562% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.80 | 11.05 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.05 | 34.12 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 14.22 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.95 | 53.50 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement