Ad is loading...
LPFCX vs RSEBX
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSEBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.16
Change+$0.05 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.92M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$59.09
Change+$0.55 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.08B
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 66.1B vs. LPFCX (57.9M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: LPFCX (13.56) vs RSEBX (0.23). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). LPFCX (3.31) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSEBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). LPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.08 vs. RSEBX (-4.40). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.94 vs. RSEBX (21.27).
| LPFCX | RSEBX | LPFCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.24 | 1.45 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.31 | 1.45 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.091 | -9.134 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.9M | 66.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 13.56 | 0.23 | 5,961% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.08 | -4.40 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.10 | -5.51 | -165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.94 | 21.27 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.00 | 20.91 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers