Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSEBX
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSEBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.61
Change+$0.10 (+1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.17M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$69.26
Change+$0.88 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.91B
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 76.9B vs. LPFCX (56.2M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: LPFCX (13.11) vs RSEBX (0.21). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). LPFCX (3.41) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSEBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. LPFCX (3.60). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.50 vs. RSEBX (20.29).
| LPFCX | RSEBX | LPFCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 1.45 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.41 | 1.45 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.182 | 6.543 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 56.2M | 76.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 13.11 | 0.21 | 6,248% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.60 | 8.83 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.56 | 27.84 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.50 | 20.29 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.17 | 38.91 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement