Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSEBX
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSEBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.55
Change+$0.06 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.04M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$67.34
Change+$0.44 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. LPFCX (61M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: LPFCX (13.11) vs RSEBX (0.21). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). LPFCX (3.41) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSEBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.30 vs. LPFCX (2.37). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.53 vs. RSEBX (15.02).
| LPFCX | RSEBX | LPFCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 1.45 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.41 | 1.45 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.182 | 3.552 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 13.11 | 0.21 | 6,248% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.37 | 4.30 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.66 | 15.38 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.53 | 15.02 | 217% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.04 | 34.50 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement