Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSEBX
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSEBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.71
Change-$0.05 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.19M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.11
Change-$0.17 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. LPFCX (58.2M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: LPFCX (12.71) vs RSEBX (0.23). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). LPFCX (3.41) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSEBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.79 vs. LPFCX (4.47). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.26 vs. RSEBX (12.50).
| LPFCX | RSEBX | LPFCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 1.45 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.41 | 1.45 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.727 | 9.389 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.2M | 80.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 12.71 | 0.23 | 5,438% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | 9.79 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.40 | 20.18 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.26 | 12.50 | 258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.60 | 44.85 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement