Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSEBX
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSEBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.83
Change+$0.01 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.37M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.04
Change+$0.35 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.78B
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 79.8B vs. LPFCX (59.4M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: LPFCX (12.76) vs RSEBX (0.23). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). LPFCX (3.41) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSEBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.34 vs. LPFCX (6.42). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.37 vs. RSEBX (16.78).
| LPFCX | RSEBX | LPFCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 1.45 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.41 | 1.45 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.000 | 9.281 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.4M | 79.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 12.76 | 0.23 | 5,475% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.42 | 9.34 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.09 | 31.03 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.37 | 16.78 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.88 | 43.37 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement