Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSLBX
LPFCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSLBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.71
Change-$0.05 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.19M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$62.23
Change-$0.15 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
LPFCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. LPFCX (58.2M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: LPFCX (12.71) vs RSLBX (0.06). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). LPFCX (3.41) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSLBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.45 vs. LPFCX (4.47). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.26 vs. RSLBX (9.31).
| LPFCX | RSLBX | LPFCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 1.75 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.41 | 1.75 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.727 | 9.182 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.2M | 80.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 12.71 | 0.06 | 21,848% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | 9.45 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.40 | 19.13 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.26 | 9.31 | 346% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.60 | 35.84 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement