Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSLBX
LPFCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSLBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.64
Change-$0.01 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.38M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.35
Change+$0.45 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.82B
LPFCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSLBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. LPFCX (57.4M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: LPFCX (12.61) vs RSLBX (0.06). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). LPFCX (3.41) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSLBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.52 vs. LPFCX (2.80). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. RSLBX (11.81).
| LPFCX | RSLBX | LPFCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 1.75 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.41 | 1.75 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.727 | 11.147 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.4M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 12.61 | 0.06 | 22,342% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.80 | 11.52 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.05 | 33.91 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 11.81 | 254% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.95 | 45.01 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement