Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSLBX
LPFCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSLBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.35M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$61.15
Change-$0.31 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.34B
LPFCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 79.3B vs. LPFCX (50.4M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: LPFCX (13.30) vs RSLBX (0.06). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). LPFCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSLBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.64 vs. LPFCX (-11.54). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.36 vs. RSLBX (-3.24).
| LPFCX | RSLBX | LPFCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.75 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.55 | 1.75 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.182 | 7.287 | -85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.4M | 79.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 13.30 | 0.06 | 23,858% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.54 | 5.64 | -205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.49 | 26.40 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.36 | -3.24 | -196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.00 | 40.20 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement