Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSLDX
LPFCX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSLDX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.61
Change+$0.10 (+1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.17M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$72.75
Change+$0.93 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.91B
LPFCX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSLDX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSLDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 76.9B vs. LPFCX (56.2M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: LPFCX (13.11) vs RSLDX (0.82). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). LPFCX (3.41) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSLDX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.54 vs. LPFCX (3.60). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.50 vs. RSLDX (24.56).
| LPFCX | RSLDX | LPFCX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 0.80 | 415% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.41 | 0.80 | 426% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.182 | 6.878 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 56.2M | 76.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 13.11 | 0.82 | 1,591% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.60 | 9.54 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.56 | 30.14 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.50 | 24.56 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers