Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSLDX
LPFCX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSLDX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.83
Change+$0.01 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.37M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$74.66
Change+$0.37 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.78B
LPFCX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSLDX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSLDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 79.8B vs. LPFCX (59.4M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: LPFCX (12.76) vs RSLDX (0.81). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). LPFCX (3.41) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSLDX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.07 vs. LPFCX (6.42). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.37 vs. RSLDX (20.95).
| LPFCX | RSLDX | LPFCX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 0.80 | 415% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.41 | 0.80 | 426% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.000 | 9.684 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.4M | 79.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 12.76 | 0.81 | 1,577% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.42 | 10.07 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.09 | 33.39 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.37 | 20.95 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement