Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs SMCWX
LPFCX vs SMCWX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs SMCWX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.57
Change-$0.04 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.13M
American Funds SMALLCAP World A
Price$74.30
Change-$0.77 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.26B
LPFCX vs SMCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. SMCWX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Hold and SMCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCWX has more cash in the bank: 81.3B vs. LPFCX (56.1M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than SMCWX: LPFCX (12.61) vs SMCWX (0.57). LPFCX was incepted earlier than SMCWX: LPFCX (15 years) vs SMCWX (35 years). LPFCX (3.41) is less costly to investors than SMCWX (1.04). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SMCWX (32.00). SMCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: SMCWX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). SMCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.74 vs. LPFCX (-2.19). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.26 vs. SMCWX (16.01).
| LPFCX | SMCWX | LPFCX / SMCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 1.04 | 319% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.41 | 1.04 | 328% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.000 | 10.291 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 56.1M | 81.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 12.61 | 0.57 | 2,199% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.19 | 6.74 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.17 | 45.28 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.26 | 16.01 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.82 | 69.46 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement