Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs SMCWX
LPFCX vs SMCWX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs SMCWX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.41
Change-$0.10 (-1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.15M
American Funds SMALLCAP World A
Price$74.80
Change-$0.43 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.56B
LPFCX vs SMCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. SMCWX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Hold and SMCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCWX has more cash in the bank: 81.6B vs. LPFCX (54.2M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than SMCWX: LPFCX (12.84) vs SMCWX (0.57). LPFCX was incepted earlier than SMCWX: LPFCX (15 years) vs SMCWX (35 years). LPFCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than SMCWX (1.04). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SMCWX (32.00). SMCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: SMCWX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). SMCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.24 vs. LPFCX (-4.38). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.89 vs. SMCWX (8.59).
| LPFCX | SMCWX | LPFCX / SMCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.04 | 237% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.55 | 1.04 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.182 | 11.034 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.2M | 81.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 12.84 | 0.57 | 2,257% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.38 | 6.24 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.96 | 43.08 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.89 | 8.59 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.86 | 62.24 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement