LPL
Price
$4.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.94B
74 days until earnings call
XIACF
Price
$6.56
Change
-$0.02 (-0.30%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
169.92B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LPL vs XIACF

Header iconLPL vs XIACF Comparison
Open Charts LPL vs XIACFBanner chart's image
LG Display
Price$4.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$649.78K
Capitalization3.94B
Xiaomi
Price$6.56
Change-$0.02 (-0.30%)
Volume$45.87K
Capitalization169.92B
LPL vs XIACF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XIACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LPL vs. XIACF commentary
Aug 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPL is a Buy and XIACF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2025
Stock price -- (LPL: $4.08 vs. XIACF: $6.56)
Brand notoriety: LPL and XIACF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Peripherals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LPL: 229% vs. XIACF: 67%
Market capitalization -- LPL: $3.94B vs. XIACF: $169.92B
LPL [@Computer Peripherals] is valued at $3.94B. XIACF’s [@Computer Peripherals] market capitalization is $169.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Peripherals] industry ranges from $3.27T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Peripherals] industry is $10.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LPL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileXIACF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LPL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • XIACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LPL is a better buy in the long-term than XIACF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LPL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XIACF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • XIACF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LPL is a better buy in the short-term than XIACF.

Price Growth

LPL (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +5.15% price change this week, while XIACF (@Computer Peripherals) price change was -3.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

LPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Peripherals (+3.99% weekly)

Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XIACF($170B) has a higher market cap than LPL($3.94B). XIACF YTD gains are higher at: 48.416 vs. LPL (32.899).
LPLXIACFLPL / XIACF
Capitalization3.94B170B2%
EBITDA4.59TN/A-
Gain YTD32.89948.41668%
P/E RatioN/A50.67-
Revenue27.43TN/A-
Total Cash992BN/A-
Total Debt14.66TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LPL vs XIACF: Fundamental Ratings
LPL
XIACF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2253
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
6084
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LPL's Valuation (5) in the Electronics Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for XIACF (76) in the null industry. This means that LPL’s stock grew significantly faster than XIACF’s over the last 12 months.

XIACF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPL (100) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that XIACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPL’s over the last 12 months.

LPL's SMR Rating (60) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as XIACF (84) in the null industry. This means that LPL’s stock grew similarly to XIACF’s over the last 12 months.

XIACF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as LPL (41) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that XIACF’s stock grew similarly to LPL’s over the last 12 months.

LPL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as XIACF (7) in the null industry. This means that LPL’s stock grew similarly to XIACF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LPLXIACF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XIACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIHL16.790.39
+2.38%
Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited
PRSO0.860.02
+1.92%
Peraso
NI42.28-0.09
-0.21%
NiSource
ORKA13.09-0.58
-4.24%
Oruka Therapeutics Inc
BLNK0.87-0.04
-4.31%
Blink Charging Co

LPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LPL and TBCH have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LPL and TBCH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LPL
1D Price
Change %
LPL100%
N/A
TBCH - LPL
33%
Poorly correlated
+8.81%
SONO - LPL
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
GPRO - LPL
27%
Poorly correlated
+7.22%
SONY - LPL
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.30%
XIACF - LPL
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More

XIACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XIACF has been closely correlated with XIACY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XIACF jumps, then XIACY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XIACF
1D Price
Change %
XIACF100%
-0.30%
XIACY - XIACF
87%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
LPL - XIACF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPRO - XIACF
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.22%
ZEPP - XIACF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
UEIC - XIACF
20%
Poorly correlated
-17.08%
More