Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LQFLX vs RWEBX
LQFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RWEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$15.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.16M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$67.08
Change+$0.11 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.01B
LQFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LQFLX (68.2M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RWEBX (0.76) vs LQFLX (0.31). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LQFLX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LQFLX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: LQFLX (0) vs RWEBX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.96 vs. RWEBX (5.65). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.09 vs. LQFLX (13.21).
| LQFLX | RWEBX | LQFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.06 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.06 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.156 | 10.329 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.2M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.76 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.96 | 5.65 | 265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.70 | 43.20 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | 50.09 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement