Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LQFLX vs RWMHX
LQFLX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RWMHX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$15.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.16M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$67.39
Change+$0.12 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.01B
LQFLX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RWMHX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LQFLX (68.2M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RWMHX (1.33) vs LQFLX (0.31). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LQFLX (6 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LQFLX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMHX: LQFLX (0) vs RWMHX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.96 vs. RWMHX (6.37). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 53.96 vs. LQFLX (13.21).
| LQFLX | RWMHX | LQFLX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.41 | 295% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.41 | 461% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.156 | 10.898 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.2M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.33 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.96 | 6.37 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.70 | 45.89 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | 53.96 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement