LQWDF
Price
$1.85
Change
+$0.03 (+1.65%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.93M
TMNSF
Price
$74.49
Change
-$1.14 (-1.51%)
Updated
Apr 22 closing price
Capitalization
6.18B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LQWDF vs TMNSF

Header iconLQWDF vs TMNSF Comparison
Open Charts LQWDF vs TMNSFBanner chart's image
LQWD TECHNOLOGIES
Price$1.85
Change+$0.03 (+1.65%)
Volume$34.88K
Capitalization2.93M
Temenos AG
Price$74.49
Change-$1.14 (-1.51%)
Volume$7
Capitalization6.18B
LQWDF vs TMNSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LQWDF vs. TMNSF commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQWDF is a Hold and TMNSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LQWDF: $1.85 vs. TMNSF: $74.49)
Brand notoriety: LQWDF and TMNSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LQWDF: 120% vs. TMNSF: 13%
Market capitalization -- LQWDF: $2.93M vs. TMNSF: $6.18B
LQWDF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.93M. TMNSF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LQWDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMNSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LQWDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMNSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMNSF is a better buy in the long-term than LQWDF.

Price Growth

LQWDF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +19.44% price change this week, while TMNSF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.45% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMNSF($6.18B) has a higher market cap than LQWDF($2.93M). TMNSF has higher P/E ratio than LQWDF: TMNSF (50.00) vs LQWDF (9.25). LQWDF YTD gains are higher at: 24.161 vs. TMNSF (4.807). TMNSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 311M vs. LQWDF (-899.86K). TMNSF has more cash in the bank: 112M vs. LQWDF (187K). LQWDF has less debt than TMNSF: LQWDF (118K) vs TMNSF (841M). TMNSF has higher revenues than LQWDF: TMNSF (955M) vs LQWDF (4.88K).
LQWDFTMNSFLQWDF / TMNSF
Capitalization2.93M6.18B0%
EBITDA-899.86K311M-0%
Gain YTD24.1614.807503%
P/E Ratio9.2550.0019%
Revenue4.88K955M0%
Total Cash187K112M0%
Total Debt118K841M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LQWDF vs TMNSF: Fundamental Ratings
LQWDF
TMNSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1741
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96100
SMR RATING
1..100
9240
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10065
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TMNSF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LQWDF (97). This means that TMNSF’s stock grew significantly faster than LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.

LQWDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as TMNSF (100). This means that LQWDF’s stock grew similarly to TMNSF’s over the last 12 months.

TMNSF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LQWDF (92). This means that TMNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.

LQWDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as TMNSF (57). This means that LQWDF’s stock grew similarly to TMNSF’s over the last 12 months.

TMNSF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LQWDF (100). This means that TMNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIGGX42.260.23
+0.55%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc R6
NBGTX29.74N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
HRLYX9.13N/A
N/A
Hartford Real Asset Y
IRPSX11.10N/A
N/A
VY® T. Rowe Price Equity Income S
VIPAX26.55N/A
N/A
Voya Index Plus LargeCap Port ADV

LQWDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LQWDF has been loosely correlated with BMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LQWDF jumps, then BMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQWDF
1D Price
Change %
LQWDF100%
+1.65%
BMR - LQWDF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
AGYS - LQWDF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
LSPKF - LQWDF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TREIF - LQWDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.54%
XIGMF - LQWDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TMNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMNSF has been loosely correlated with TMSNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMNSF jumps, then TMSNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMNSF
1D Price
Change %
TMNSF100%
N/A
TMSNY - TMNSF
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
FSLY - TMNSF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
NTWK - TMNSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.19%
LQWDF - TMNSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
HPTO - TMNSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More