LQWDF
Price
$1.34
Change
-$0.04 (-2.90%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
40.85M
TMNSF
Price
$91.93
Change
+$13.49 (+17.20%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
6.26B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LQWDF vs TMNSF

Header iconLQWDF vs TMNSF Comparison
Open Charts LQWDF vs TMNSFBanner chart's image
LQWD TECHNOLOGIES
Price$1.34
Change-$0.04 (-2.90%)
Volume$12.11K
Capitalization40.85M
Temenos AG
Price$91.93
Change+$13.49 (+17.20%)
Volume$236
Capitalization6.26B
LQWDF vs TMNSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LQWDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LQWDF vs. TMNSF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQWDF is a Hold and TMNSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LQWDF: $1.34 vs. TMNSF: $91.93)
Brand notoriety: LQWDF and TMNSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LQWDF: 5% vs. TMNSF: 124%
Market capitalization -- LQWDF: $40.85M vs. TMNSF: $6.26B
LQWDF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $40.85M. TMNSF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $320.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LQWDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMNSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LQWDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMNSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMNSF is a better buy in the long-term than LQWDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LQWDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMNSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LQWDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TMNSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LQWDF and TMNSF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LQWDF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +14.54% price change this week, while TMNSF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.97% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMNSF($6.26B) has a higher market cap than LQWDF($40.9M). TMNSF YTD gains are higher at: 29.345 vs. LQWDF (-10.060). TMNSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 354M vs. LQWDF (-2.12M). TMNSF has more cash in the bank: 135M vs. LQWDF (1.33M). TMNSF has higher revenues than LQWDF: TMNSF (1.05B) vs LQWDF (8.18K).
LQWDFTMNSFLQWDF / TMNSF
Capitalization40.9M6.26B1%
EBITDA-2.12M354M-1%
Gain YTD-10.06029.345-34%
P/E RatioN/A38.46-
Revenue8.18K1.05B0%
Total Cash1.33M135M1%
Total DebtN/A717M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LQWDF vs TMNSF: Fundamental Ratings
LQWDF
TMNSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6047
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TMNSF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LQWDF (91). This means that TMNSF’s stock grew significantly faster than LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.

LQWDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as TMNSF (100). This means that LQWDF’s stock grew similarly to TMNSF’s over the last 12 months.

LQWDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TMNSF (100). This means that LQWDF’s stock grew similarly to TMNSF’s over the last 12 months.

LQWDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as TMNSF (47). This means that LQWDF’s stock grew similarly to TMNSF’s over the last 12 months.

LQWDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TMNSF (100). This means that LQWDF’s stock grew similarly to TMNSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LQWDFTMNSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LQWDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NESRF12.540.30
+2.41%
Northern Star Resources Ltd
TCVNF0.64N/A
+0.55%
Tocvan Ventures Corp.
IRMTF23.23N/A
N/A
Information Svcs Corp
WHLT0.03N/A
N/A
Chase Packaging Corp.
ORGJF53.03N/A
N/A
Organo Corp.

LQWDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LQWDF has been loosely correlated with BMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LQWDF jumps, then BMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQWDF
1D Price
Change %
LQWDF100%
-2.89%
BMR - LQWDF
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.96%
AGYS - LQWDF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
TREIF - LQWDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-10.14%
TMNSF - LQWDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSTM - LQWDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
More

TMNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMNSF has been loosely correlated with TMSNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMNSF jumps, then TMSNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMNSF
1D Price
Change %
TMNSF100%
N/A
TMSNY - TMNSF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
FSLY - TMNSF
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.07%
NTWK - TMNSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.25%
LQWDF - TMNSF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.89%
HPTO - TMNSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More