LRCDF
Price
$23.21
Change
-$0.39 (-1.65%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.04B
LUMB
Price
$13.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
44.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LRCDF vs LUMB

Header iconLRCDF vs LUMB Comparison
Open Charts LRCDF vs LUMBBanner chart's image
Laurentian Bank of Canada
Price$23.21
Change-$0.39 (-1.65%)
Volume$5.39K
Capitalization1.04B
Lumbee Guaranty Bank
Price$13.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization44.86M
LRCDF vs LUMB Comparison Chart in %
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LRCDF vs. LUMB commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRCDF is a Buy and LUMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LRCDF: $23.21 vs. LUMB: $13.50)
Brand notoriety: LRCDF and LUMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LRCDF: 99% vs. LUMB: 5%
Market capitalization -- LRCDF: $1.04B vs. LUMB: $44.86M
LRCDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.04B. LUMB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $44.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LRCDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLUMB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LRCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LUMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LRCDF is a better buy in the long-term than LUMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LRCDF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUMB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LRCDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LUMB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LRCDF is a better buy in the short-term than LUMB.

Price Growth

LRCDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.81% price change this week, while LUMB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRCDF($1.04B) has a higher market cap than LUMB($44.9M). LRCDF has higher P/E ratio than LUMB: LRCDF (10.60) vs LUMB (9.18). LRCDF YTD gains are higher at: 16.224 vs. LUMB (5.391). LUMB has less debt than LRCDF: LUMB (12.1K) vs LRCDF (15.6B). LRCDF has higher revenues than LUMB: LRCDF (975M) vs LUMB (18.7M).
LRCDFLUMBLRCDF / LUMB
Capitalization1.04B44.9M2,321%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.2245.391301%
P/E Ratio10.609.18115%
Revenue975M18.7M5,214%
Total CashN/A8.96M-
Total Debt15.6B12.1K128,925,620%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LRCDF vs LUMB: Fundamental Ratings
LRCDF
LUMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9346
SMR RATING
1..100
1460
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4728
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRCDF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUMB (63). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUMB’s over the last 12 months.

LUMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LRCDF (93). This means that LUMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUMB (60). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUMB’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as LUMB (60). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to LUMB’s over the last 12 months.

LUMB's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (47). This means that LUMB’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LRCDFLUMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
45%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QICNX17.540.13
+0.75%
AQR International Multi-Style N
HSWTX22.090.15
+0.68%
Hartford Schroders International Stk R5
DFDPX40.510.19
+0.47%
DF Dent Premier Growth Investor
MCMVX21.350.10
+0.47%
Monongahela All Cap Value
HNVRX43.280.18
+0.42%
Harbor Small Cap Value Retirement

LRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRCDF and SFBS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRCDF and SFBS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCDF
1D Price
Change %
LRCDF100%
N/A
SFBS - LRCDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
CATY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
BANR - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
KBCSY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
FFBC - LRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
More

LUMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LUMB and NWPP have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUMB and NWPP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUMB
1D Price
Change %
LUMB100%
N/A
NWPP - LUMB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLEW - LUMB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LRCDF - LUMB
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFGP - LUMB
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
LOGN - LUMB
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More