RHHBY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LRGC | RHHBY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 44% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 45% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LRGC and V have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRGC and V's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRGC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRGC | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| V - LRGC | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
| STLA - LRGC | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| RHHBY - LRGC | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
| CDW - LRGC | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| HD - LRGC | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RHHBY has been loosely correlated with RHHVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RHHBY jumps, then RHHVF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RHHBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RHHBY | 100% | -0.68% | ||
| RHHVF - RHHBY | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| NVS - RHHBY | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| JNJ - RHHBY | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| RHHBF - RHHBY | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BMY - RHHBY | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.70% | ||
More | ||||