LRHC
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
24.21M
SHMSF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.06 (-33.33%)
Updated
Mar 21 closing price
Capitalization
569.78M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LRHC vs SHMSF

Header iconLRHC vs SHMSF Comparison
Open Charts LRHC vs SHMSFBanner chart's image
La Rosa Holdings
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.83M
Capitalization24.21M
Shimao Services Holdings
Price$0.12
Change-$0.06 (-33.33%)
Volume$142
Capitalization569.78M
LRHC vs SHMSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LRHC vs. SHMSF commentary
Jun 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRHC is a Hold and SHMSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2025
Stock price -- (LRHC: $0.13 vs. SHMSF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: LRHC and SHMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LRHC: 39% vs. SHMSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LRHC: $24.21M vs. SHMSF: $569.78M
LRHC [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $24.21M. SHMSF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $569.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LRHC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHMSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LRHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LRHC and SHMSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LRHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LRHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

LRHC (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -10.52% price change this week, while SHMSF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

LRHC is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.79% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHMSF($570M) has a higher market cap than LRHC($24.2M). SHMSF YTD gains are higher at: -30.923 vs. LRHC (-85.090). SHMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.36B vs. LRHC (-14.77M). SHMSF has more cash in the bank: 5.65B vs. LRHC (350K). LRHC has less debt than SHMSF: LRHC (805K) vs SHMSF (51.4M). SHMSF has higher revenues than LRHC: SHMSF (7.7B) vs LRHC (46.7M).
LRHCSHMSFLRHC / SHMSF
Capitalization24.2M570M4%
EBITDA-14.77M1.36B-1%
Gain YTD-85.090-30.923275%
P/E RatioN/A6.02-
Revenue46.7M7.7B1%
Total Cash350K5.65B0%
Total Debt805K51.4M2%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LRHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXTGX53.39N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Growth 1.2 A
JIVZX29.34N/A
N/A
JPMorgan U.S. Applied Data Sci Val R2
DEMZX22.77N/A
N/A
Macquarie Emerging Markets R6
MRJCX10.54N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Multi-Asset Real Return C
WHGOX11.87N/A
N/A
Westwood Income Opportunity Ultra

LRHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRHC has been loosely correlated with SHMSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRHC jumps, then SHMSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRHC
1D Price
Change %
LRHC100%
-6.32%
SHMSF - LRHC
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MRCBF - LRHC
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGPYF - LRHC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGD - LRHC
14%
Poorly correlated
+10.09%
DOUG - LRHC
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
More

SHMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHMSF has been loosely correlated with EVGPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHMSF jumps, then EVGPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHMSF
1D Price
Change %
SHMSF100%
N/A
EVGPF - SHMSF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LRHC - SHMSF
38%
Loosely correlated
-6.32%
OZ - SHMSF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
AWCA - SHMSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.18%
HHH - SHMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
More